Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM
- From: Miroslav Janíček <mira.janicek@...>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 22:37:43 +0200
> On 6 Oct 2016, at 16:21, Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/10/16 08:08 AM, Miroslav Janíček wrote:
>>
>> “How do you decide between LuaJ and LuaJava?”
>
> LuaJ doesn't have states so there's no sandboxing of the string (and function, number, etc) metatable.
True: if more than one state is needed, LuaJava is preferable.
M.
- References:
- [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Miroslav Janíček
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Marc Balmer
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Marc Balmer
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Miroslav Janíček
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Hisham
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Miroslav Janíček
- Re: [ANN] Rembulan, an implementation of Lua 5.3 for the JVM, Soni L.