Re: explicit mode
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: explicit mode
- From: Duane Leslie <parakleta@...>
- Date: 2016年5月11日 11:36:07 +1000
> local function bar(x)@(_ENV,bar)
> return snafu(x * foo(3,2)
> end
>
> and you get an error because snafu is not declared for bar(), and you are
> now pointlessly including a local no longer needed.
There should never be a reason to require using any new syntax. In the absence of markup the behaviour should be as existing (so `bar(x)` without annotation would work just fine). If you wanted the restrictions then you would want the error that `snafu` was not declared.
Regards,
Duane.