Re: x < y < z
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: x < y < z
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: 2015年7月17日 13:06:17 +0200
2015年07月17日 11:56 GMT+02:00 Pierre Chapuis <catwell@archlinux.us>:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Tim Caswell <tim@creationix.com> wrote:
>>> This is one of those areas where languages without infix notation, but
>>> variable-length arguments (like lisp) smile. You can just do (< x y z)
>>> and
>>> it will do what you expect or (< (<x y) z) to simulate the lua
>>> behaviour.
>>>
>>> But then you have to give up infix notation and/or have crazy
>>> conventions
>>> like {x < y < z} means to transform to (< x y z) if curly braces are
>>> used
>>> and every odd symbol is the same.
>>
>> It's also possible to do it at the grammar level, defining the
>> comparison operators as being optionally ternary.
>
> If you allow that, you probably also want to allow x < y <= z and the like.
APL has an operator "scan" over arrays so that
fct / x
returns the value of a function that can be coded in Lua as
function scan(fct,x)
result = unit(fct)
for _,v in ipairs(x) do result = fct(result,v) end
return result
end
There may well be som such function in Penlight and Microlight.