Hi Steve! On 29/06/2011 17.24, steve donovan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@interfree.it> wrote:As an end user of a programming language like Lua, in which I often write simple DSLs, I'd like to be able to define such a parser by only defining the operators and their characteristics, not to write down a grammar.It does sound like an interesting problem, but why not use Lua itself? That's a non-rhetorical question, that is, -what features do you need that could not be done in Lua?
Arbitrary custom operators.
Well, not that often, I admit. As I said, the post had also a "philosophical" twist :-) Still, sometimes doing without custom operators is a pain. Especially when mapping concepts from math.-are they essential to the DSL?
For example, consider math vectors: W = V1 :x: V2 + V3 W = V1:cross_product(V2) + V3 -- less readable a = (V1 [.] V2) / |V1 [.] V2| a = V1:dot_product(V2) / V1:dot_product(V2):abs() -- less readable
I wonder if LuaMacro could be of any help here - I only skimmed over the readme, but I did not dare "put more meat on the grill" (as we say in Italy) ;-)(I won't start gong on about lexical preprocessing since I probably won't stop)
steve d.
cheers, -- Lorenzo