Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
• From: David Given <dg@...>
• Date: 2011年1月28日 18:33:23 +0000

---

On 28/01/11 18:21, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
[...]
> That can be said about any feature, really. Bad programmers will write
> bad programs no matter what features the language has.
(see signature)
-- 
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│ "There does not now, nor will there ever, exist a programming
│ language in which it is the least bit hard to write bad programs." ---
│ Flon's Axiom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, David Manura
  • Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Axel Kittenberger
  • Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Axel Kittenberger
  • Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

• Prev by Date: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
• Next by Date: Re: Can't pass a struct by value to LuaJIT FFI varargs function?
• Previous by thread: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
• Next by thread: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread