Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view
- From: Pierre-Yves Gérardy <pygy79@...>
- Date: 2010年11月25日 17:46:30 +0100
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 13:02, Rob Kendrick <rjek@rjek.com> wrote:
> do [ x, y ] return x * y end
Yep, but with an optional short return statement. It is still much
more readable than the current syntax. I'd like to have a syntax
that's clearly different from function invocation.
function acc()
local up = 0
return do [x] up = up+x; => up end
end
"return do" is weird, though.
-- Pierre-Yves
- References:
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Gunnar Zötl
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Luis Carvalho
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mateusz Czaplinski
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Paul Hudson
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Rob Kendrick