On 11/21/2010 2:00 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
Don't be too hard on dcharno. He was just capitalizing the words for illustration. That's stylistic. I thought Luiz reply was testy, but then I have been pushing a bit, with good reason. Blame me if you want. I was the one who used 'really sucks' which may have led Luiz to use the 'suck' word in his reply. That said, I have waited patiently for 3 weeks for that bit of feedback and justification for the change. Now, I expected some form of give-and-take feedback on work releases. Yet when I pointed out the change, the powers-that-be deigned it unnecessary to enlighten the masses for 3 weeks. The library name was already changed per Mike Pall's suggestion and we all thought that was it. Nobody was talking about two libraries clashing anymore. But "common asm use"? I don't buy that.On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:52 PM, dcharno wrote:On 11/20/2010 03:59 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:[snip] It is not a good reason to CAPTIALIZE a FUNCTION name.You are being purposefully belligerent and when the authors call you and others out on it for making a fuss, their attitude is bad? Really? It's fine to discuss the merits of capital letters in function names but don't complain when others respond in kind to your barbed assertions.
-- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia