Re: Ternary operator patch
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Ternary operator patch
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: 2010年9月10日 10:18:16 +0200
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:
> [I admit, an if-else operator is something I've wanted quite a few
> times in the past, and given the extremely small implementation cost,
> seems like it's almost a no-brainer...]
A child has an extremely small implementation cost as well. You have to
keep the followup costs in mind.
--
David Kastrup