Re: Lua 5.2
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2010年1月28日 10:05:07 +0200
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:00 AM, David Burgess <dabsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is exactly what [romptetd the question.
What is the precedence involved in require 'bit'? Would it not pick
up the built-in module before going for a cpath search, even if the
built-in bit was not originally loaded?
No doubt there is a hack (Jerome knows all about loaders etc) but it
could get a little ugly.