lua-users home
lua-l archive

Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


> Though Roberto's answer made me think for a moment that 
> my use of Lua is somehow wrong, My experience has been that given enough 
> libraries, Lua is quite good as a primary implementation language. 
> Perhaps Roberto is saying that Perl, Python, and the like are better in 
> that role, so the best use of Lua is for scripting, the purpose for 
> which Lua was originally developed. However, Lua's minimal core and 
> relatively painless C API set Lua apart in my mind. [...]
I agree with you, but I think it is difficult to sell this idea of
"small is beautiful" to a larger audience. So, you may qualify that
answer as "For mainstream relevance, the future of Lua is scripting."
(BTW, your own emphasis on a "painless C API" also seems to point to a
"scripting" approach, does it not? ;)
-- Roberto

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /