Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?
• From: Matt Campbell <mattcampbell@...>
• Date: 2008年9月12日 10:05:43 -0500

---

I've been watching the recent mailing list discussions on Lua for Windows. I wonder why there is a desire for this kind of "batteries included" distribution, in light of LuaRocks. It seems to me that instead of trying to include every library under the moon, it would be better to just include Lua, LuaRocks, and SciTE. A GUI front-end to install rocks might be nice, but then we're talking about a tool for programmers here; it seems to me that a command-line interface shouldn't be a problem. Thoughts?

Matt

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?, Andrew Wilson
  • Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?, Fabien

• References:
  • [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, RJP Computing
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, Linker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, Mark Meijer

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released
• Next by thread: Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread