Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2
- From: Bertrand Mansion <golgote@...>
- Date: 2008年2月26日 16:11:51 +0100
Le 26 févr. 08 à 15:51, Alex Davies a écrit :
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Gladysh"
Though, adding a continue would bring discussions about adding
continue N and break N (for exiting/continuing Nth nested loop above)
-- features for which I vigorously against. :)
Alexander.
Although there have been instances where a break N would have saved
me grief, I definitely agree. I'd prefer to have to think harder
when writing those cases then to have more difficulty understanding
the code at a later date. So lets consider that the aforementioned
discussion on continue N and break N, and implement continue ;).
I also miss "continue", I don't care about "continue N" though.
--
Bertrand Mansion
Mamasam
Work : http://www.mamasam.com
Blog : http://golgote.freeflux.net
- References:
- Location of a package, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Location of a package, eugeny gladkih
- upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Asko Kauppi
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Doug Rogers
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2, Miles Bader
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2, Alex Davies
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2, Alex Davies