Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3
• From: Ignacio Burgueño <ignaciob@...>
• Date: 2008年2月04日 11:05:55 -0300

---

David Burgess wrote:

Two comments:
1) Adding a manifest, may break your code if it is run on OSs earlier than
XP/SP2. Known problem. If you are using manifests then the code will
probably have trouble on W2K and earlier. I found this problem when a
manifested Lua DLL blew my XP/SP2 out of the water (killed the OS),

I'm interested in this. Do you have any links about this problem? It didn't occur to me that pre-XP/SP2 Windows could choke on dlls with embedded manifests. Since the OS does not know about them, it wouldn't matter if they were present or not.

Regards,
Ignacio Burgueño

---

• References:
  • [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3, David Burgess

• Prev by Date: Re: powerfull io replacement (was: Re: how to install slnunicode library)
• Next by Date: Another example for syntactically lightweight closures
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3
• Next by thread: RE: [ANN] LuaBinaries for Lua 5.1.3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread