Re: Bookworm Adventures Postmortem
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Bookworm Adventures Postmortem
- From: Kein-Hong Man <keinhong@...>
- Date: 2007年3月18日 19:31:13 +0800
Lothar Scholz wrote:
[snip snip]
I must say i think the same same. I like the programming model but it
is very slow and i really don't know why the design of lua wants to
use slow hashtable access anywhere. My performance tests show that for
function calls there is a lot (i really mean a lot) room for
optimization.
And sorry i never understood why simplicity is a positive value in a
language implementation. A clean simple API is but internal
implementation is _NOT_. Thats a very academic point of view.
I'm now using lua because there is nothing else with this memory
footprint, but i have to say i'm not as impressed as i was after
reading the first tutorial.
And by the way, please offer real arrays and a builtin performance
optimized object system soon.
I must say that the noise level is becoming a little high.
This must be a bad habit that the phenomenon of blogging is
encouraging.
--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia