Rici Lake wrote:
On 21-Feb-07, at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Darling wrote:
Just as the subject says, I'm curious just exactly how predictable
the random function is given a known seed. If I use the same seed
on all platforms (Windows, Linux, and Mac) can I expect the next N
calls to random to always generate the same values? This seems to
be the case on Windows, but I can't validate it on the other
platforms (yet).
Lua uses the standard C library random function, which is
deterministic. However, it might not be the same implementation on
all platforms; i.e. you might get a different sequence starting from
the same seed on a 64-bit platform than on a 32-bit platform (for
example), or with different C standard library implementations.
If portability of the pseudo-random sequence is important to you you can simply roll your own random function. Some pseudo-random generators have very basic implementations:
For example here is an example implementation (took me 5 minutes) of the first one on the list above (Blum Blum Shub) in Lua:
do
local p = 7907 -- 11 in wikipedia example, but has a too short cycle
local q = 7919 -- 19 in wikipedia example
local s = 3
local xn = s
assert(p%4==3)
assert(q%4==3)
function randombit()
xn = xn^2 % p*q
return xn % 2
end
function randomseed(seed)
xn = seed
end
function random()
local n = 0
for i=0,31 do
n = n*2 + randombit()
end
return n
end
end
randomseed(37)
for i=1,10 do
print(string.format("%08X", random()))
end
print("------------------------")
randomseed(37)
for i=1,10 do
print(string.format("%08X", random()))
end