Re: [ANN] Lua 5.1 Debian package
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.1 Debian package
- From: Adrián Pérez <moebius.lists@...>
- Date: 2006年2月01日 16:57:56 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El 01/02/2006, a las 16:21, Antonio Scuri escribió:
At 01:18 27/1/2006, John Belmonte wrote:
Library SONAME
--------------
[...]
[...]
Are there other Lua packages? Can we all converge to a common
standard for names?
I have been using Gentoo lately (both Portage under MacOS X and under
Linux). Current Gentoo ebuilds for Lua are named like «lua-5.1», but
that's only the (irrelevant) name of the ebuild. Installed libraries
are named «liblua.5.1.so» with two symlinks named «liblua.5.so» and
«liblua.so» pointing to the library. I think there would be no
problem at all in using «liblua5.1.so» -- people maintaining ebuilds
won't complain if someone asks them to drop the leading dot, AFAIK.
P.S: This is my first mail to lua-l after a long time without
writing, but I've been reading from time to time. I'm still alive,
but busy with University work.
- --
Adrián Pérez
«A day without laugh is a lost day.» -- Woody Allen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFD4NqNghBwwjayrGQRAnVaAJ9cZryLCB87VmbIJDmfnET67Fj/HACePbQD
RYpSQ1LdiGsfaUm0hDxm9D8=
=D8AL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----