Re: os.setenv()???
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: os.setenv()???
- From: Michael Abbott <mabster@...>
- Date: 2006年1月11日 01:51:23 +1100
On Wed, 2006年01月11日 at 01:48 +1100, Michael Abbott wrote:
> > Interpreted code will *always* be slower than native code. You can
> > have power (expose the primitives) or performance (wrap function call
> > sequences in single Lua functions), but I severely doubt you can have
> > both.
> <snip>
>
> At the moment I think Lua is fulfilling both the speed and usability
> goals. That is, by providing just the interpret you are providing a
> fast (for a dynamically-typed language ;) extensibility language. By
> providing extremely high-level libraries you are also catering for the
> people that want to be divorced from the performance details as much as
> possible.
That said, I meant given any new high-level libraries like the ones you
were discussing (all iterator-based, etc.)
- Mab
- References:
- os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- RE: os.setenv()???, Dolan, Ryanne Thomas (UMR-Student)
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Diego Nehab
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Rici Lake
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, Rici Lake
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, Lisa Parratt
- Re: os.setenv()???, Michael Abbott