On Sunday 14 August 2005 5:52 pm, Klaus Ripke wrote: > For persisting tables, > http://lua-users.org/wiki/PersistentTablesSqlite > clearly is ok and nice, but using luatdb instead > is much faster. like really much. what i'd like to see is a direct interface from Lua to the SQLite bytecode, or even better to the tables engine. from what i've seen it's similar to BDB, but having a SQL interface for other processes is very nice... > You'd only use a SQL DB if there is some good external > reason to do so, typically accompanied by some > table structure interface you have to match. > No? or when the underlying engine is really so good to offset the burden of SQL; lots people seem to think that's the case with SQLite (i haven't tried it, but i could believe it) -- Javier
Attachment:
pgp0dy5P7aJA6.pgp
Description: PGP signature