Re: changes in 'require'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: changes in 'require'
- From: Tomas <tomas@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:57:51 -0300 (BRT)
1) Lua modules before C.
I think this is retrograde step. The argument that Lua should be first
because "it is more flexible" is fallacious. The argument couldd also be
that it makes a package installation more easily corrupted. We have
been using different versions of require for over a year now and we find
the C before Lua protocol to work rather well. This change is also
rather disruptive, we have got used to the the way it searches and
find it convenient.
I think it doesn't matter. There shouldn't be two files
with the same name and different extensions, right?
Tomas