Re: Lua 5.1 (work6) now available (for loop)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Lua 5.1 (work6) now available (for loop)
• From: Asko Kauppi <askok@...>
• Date: 2005年5月19日 20:03:23 +0300

---

ipairs() would traverse such a table in indexed order, while pairs() would not guarantee any order.

Joshua Jensen kirjoitti 19.5.2005 kello 19.40:

And after checking the manual again, it seems to me that ipairs would be the same as pairs on a table consisting purely of array entries. Is that true,

or am I missing something?

---

• References:
  • RE: Lua 5.1 (work6) now available (for loop), Joshua Jensen

• Prev by Date: Re: Implementation of %
• Next by Date: Iteration
• Previous by thread: RE: Lua 5.1 (work6) now available (for loop)
• Next by thread: Iteration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread