Re: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding)
• From: Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>
• Date: 2004年2月28日 16:21:57 +0200

---

What's the current development background of IUP? Is it a 'community project' or (as i think) contribution of a selected group of Lua people. I'd be willing to colaborate if there is strong consensus that IUP is _the_ Lua GUI for the future. This situation where there is no clear multi-platform winner is not a good one.

-ak
Gunnar Zötl kirjoittaa lauantaina, 28. helmikuuta 2004, kello 14:00:

Hallo Lua,
JC> Mark Stroetzel Glasberg wrote:

Thatcher Ulrich wrote:

- all symbols defined within a LTN7 namespace table (T.Ulrich)

JC> Also, the ability to use PNG, GIF, JPG images in buttons, etc. directly

JC> rather than having to import them through Edpatt would be great.
I would very much like to see bindings to other toolkits than just
Motif, the most popular candidates being GTK and QT.
Gunnar

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding), Renato Cerqueira
  • Re[4]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding), Gunnar Zötl

• References:
  • Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding), Gunnar Zötl

• Prev by Date: Re: lua debuggers?
• Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding)
• Previous by thread: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding)
• Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: Stoppers for IUP..? (Re: GTK Binding)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread