Fw: Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??]

The references to SOAP 1.1 in the various SOAP 1.2 documents need to be
fixed.
............................................
David C. Fallside, IBM
Data Management Standards
Tel 530.477.7169 (TL 544.9665)
fallside@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 01/07/2004 08:42 AM
-----
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Scott Nichol" |
| | <snichol@computer|
| | .org> |
| | Sent by: |
| | xml-dist-app-requ|
| | est@w3.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 12/18/2003 02:42 |
| | PM |
|---------+---------------------------->
 >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 | |
 | To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> |
 | cc: |
 | Subject: Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??] |
 >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Please forgive me for barging in on this list.
I am not sure to whom I should bring attention that the specs, namely the
Primer (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/) and Messaging Framework (
http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/) contain the same bad link for SOAP 1.1.
Both point the user to http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/, which *was* SOAP 1.1,
but which is now the Messaging Framework. SOAP 1.1 can, in fact, be found
at [1] below (which I found in an old post to this list by Martin Gudgin).
Amusingly, the document at [2] below also has bad links for SOAP 1.1.
Scott Nichol
> If you have to work with SOAP 1.1 then the Note[1] you found IS the
> latest spec. You might also take a look at the WS-I Basic Profile[2]
> which clarifies some of the ambiguities in SOAP 1.1 ( amongst other
> things ).
>
> Gudge
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/
> [2]
> http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-06/BasicProfile-1.0-BdAD.html