GULP 5.8, was: GULP 5.7, was: GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> I agree with that fix.
OK, here we go...:
-------------- GULP (Version 5.8) --------------
- A lock either directly or indirectly locks a resource.
- A LOCK request with a non-empty body creates a new lock, and the
 resource identified by the request-URL is directly locked by that lock.
 The "lock-root" of the new lock is the request-URL. If at the time of
 the request, the request-URL is not mapped to a resource, a new
 resource with empty content MUST be created by the request.
- If a collection is directly locked by a depth:infinity lock, all
 members of that collection (other than the collection itself) are
 indirectly locked by that lock. In particular, if an internal
 member resource is added to a collection that is locked by a
 depth:infinity lock, and if the resource is not locked by that lock,
 then the resource becomes indirectly locked by that lock.
 Conversely, if a resource is indirectly locked with a depth:infinity
 lock, and if the result of deleting an internal member URI is that
 the resource is no longer a member of the collection that is
 directly locked by that lock, then the resource is no longer locked
 by that lock.
- An UNLOCK request deletes the lock with the specified lock token.
 The request-URL of the request MUST identify a resource that
 is either directly or indirectly locked by that lock.
 After a lock is deleted, no resource is locked by that lock.
- A lock token is "submitted" in a request when it appears in an If
 header.
- If a request would modify the content for a locked resource, a dead
 property of a locked resource, a live property that is defined to be
 lockable for a locked resource, or an internal member URI of a
 locked collection, the request MUST fail unless the lock-token for
 that lock is submitted in the request. An internal member URI
 of a collection is considered to be modified if it is added,
 removed, or identifies a different resource.
- If a request causes a directly locked resource to no longer be
 mapped to the lock-root of that lock, then the request MUST
 fail unless the lock-token for that lock is submitted in the
 request. If the request succeeds, then that lock MUST have been
 deleted by that request.
- If a request would cause a resource to be locked by two different
 exclusive locks, the request MUST fail.
-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 13:13:37 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /