While trying to compile tango with dmd 1.046, I ran into the a problem with the di-header generated for atomic.d. A reduced version that reproduces the bug in dmd 2.032 aswell is test.d: int foo(int function() fn) { return fn(); } int bar(T)() { return foo(function int (){ return 0; }); } >dmd -c -H test.d >dmd -c test.di test.di(10): found 'function' when expecting '.' following 'int' test.di(10): found '(' when expecting identifier following 'int.' test.di(11): found '{' when expecting ';' following 'return statement' test.di(14): Declaration expected, not ')' test.di(16): unrecognized declaration This is caused by a wrong function literal being generated into the di-file: // D import file generated from 'test.d' int foo(int function() fn) { return fn(); } template bar(T) { int bar() { return foo(int function() { return 0; } ); } } Note the difference "foo(int function()..." and "foo(function int ()...".
Here is the patch that fixes the problem, but I have no idea why it was implemented the way it was before. There might be other places that may need the original implementation. --- func.c (revision 196) +++ func.c (working copy) @@ -2426,15 +2426,9 @@ void FuncLiteralDeclaration::toCBuffer(OutBuffer *buf, HdrGenState *hgs) { - static Identifier *idfunc; - static Identifier *iddel; - - if (!idfunc) - idfunc = new Identifier("function", 0); - if (!iddel) - iddel = new Identifier("delegate", 0); - - type->toCBuffer(buf, ((tok == TOKdelegate) ? iddel : idfunc), hgs); + buf->writestring(kind()); + buf->writeByte(' '); + type->toCBuffer(buf, NULL, hgs); bodyToCBuffer(buf, hgs); }
Changelog 366
(In reply to comment #2) > Changelog 366 http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/366
Fixed dmd 1.057 and 2.041
AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) / アドレス: モード: デフォルト 音声ブラウザ ルビ付き 配色反転 文字拡大 モバイル