<nettime> How to Avoid Complying with ICANN's ByLaws

nettime's_roving_reporter on Sat, 1 Dec 2001 07:03:33 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> How to Avoid Complying with ICANN's ByLaws


 <via tbyfield@panix.com>
<http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=483&mode=thread&order=0>
 How to Avoid Complying with ICANN's ByLaws
 Posted by david on Friday, November 30 @ 13:39:00 MST
 Contributed by joannalane
 
 ICANN's behavior follows in that fine old American
 tradition, the most corrupt political machines. Here's a
 handy guide to the ways ICANN can avoid complying with its
 own rules and procedures.
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 Claim a "narrow technical mission" (avoids engagement in an
 argument one cannot win) 
 
 Claim that "societal issues" must be given proper
 consideration in policy decisions (useful to advance
 "mission creep")
 
 Claim lack of adequate representation/ consensus building
 procedures (isolates and disarms opponents)
 
 Issue a press release to claim wide community support for a
 new policy (avoids having to produce any supporting
 documentation)
 
 Claim that ICANN is an evolving process (valid defense
 against material evidence of failed policies)
 
 Claim that ICANN is not a legal enforcing organization
 (protects the interests of donors that are in reach of
 contract)
 
 Deny input from selected groups (useful to ensure
 constituencies recommend policies that fit with master plan)
 
 Withdraw Secretariat services (good for saotaging the tenure
 of potentially effective Chairs and Working Groups)
 
 Create an intake committee (filtering device to eliminate
 unwanted agenda items)
 
 Make an announcement to run a particular course of action
 (useful to override a resolution that has been passed for an
 opposite course of action- only effective if the issue has
 been ignored for a while)
 
 Decide that the views of 7 - 21 people represents community
 consensus (reduces the workload to sustantiate desired
 results/ eliminates assemly input without the need to
 restructure)
 
 Withhold information (in particular financial
 expenditure/budgetary cuts that cannot be sustantiated)
 
 Fail to enforce Registrar agreements (write "politically
 correct" clauses into contracts which both signatories know
 will not be enforced)
 
 The difference between an honest politician and a corrupt
 one is that the honest politician stays bought. ICANN isn't
 even that honest, as both the winners and the losers of the
 TLD lottery can attest.
 
 [With thanks to Roeland Meyer for categorizing, analysis and
 notes.]
 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /