Krzysztof,
On 9/9/25 3:32 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 08/09/2025 19:52, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:
Krzysztof,
On 8/21/25 3:46 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:12:49PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:
[...]
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-rdma
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-rsz
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-wdma
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-wrot
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-rdma
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-rsz
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-wdma
+ - mediatek,mt8173-mdp-wrot
+ - const: mediatek,mt8173-mdp
This makes no sense. How devices can be compatible and can not be
compatible.
According to the driver source code (and the previous txt mt8173-mdp
bindings), there must be a "controller node" with compatible
`mediatek,mt8173-mdp`. Then its sibling nodes (including itself) should
But you did not define "mediatek,mt8173-mdp" here, so what are you
talking about?
I talk here about "wrot" and others, I thought it is obvious from the
mistake in the schema.
Ack.
[...]
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: mediatek,mt8173-mdp
This makes no sense either.
Same question above about compatibles.
How same question? Do you understand this code? It is nothing the same -
you have here contains!
Ack. Will resubmit properly in v2.
Thanks,
--
Ariel D'Alessandro
Software Engineer
Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718