[フレーム]
ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.
INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL
Sign in with your personal SPIE Account.
No SPIE Account? Create one
SPIE digital library
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Advanced Search
Home > Journals > J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. > Volume 11 > Issue 4 > Article
11 March 2025 Optimization of X-ray event screening using ground and in-orbit data for the Resolve instrument onboard the XRISM satellite
Yuto Mochizuki, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Caroline A. Kilbourne, Megan E. Eckart, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Yoshiaki Kanemaru, Maurice A. Leutenegger, Misaki Mizumoto, Frederick S. Porter, Kosuke Sato, Makoto Sawada, Shin’ya Yamada
Author Affiliations +
Yuto MochizukiORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-1821,1,2,* Masahiro TsujimotoORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-5556,2 Caroline A. Kilbourne,3 Megan E. Eckart,4 Yoshitaka Ishisaki,5 Yoshiaki Kanemaru,2 Maurice A. LeuteneggerORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-7595,3 Misaki MizumotoORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-0361,6 Frederick S. Porter,3 Kosuke SatoORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5774-1633,7 Makoto Sawada,8 Shin’ya YamadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-893X 8

1The Univ. of Tokyo (Japan)
2Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Japan)
3NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr. (United States)
4Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (United States)
5Tokyo Metropolitan Univ. (Japan)
6Univ. of Teacher Education Fukuoka (Japan)
7Intl Ctr. for Quantum-field Measurement Systems for Studies of the Universe and Particles (Japan)
8Rikkyo Univ. (Japan)

*Address all correspondence to Yuto Mochizuki, mochizuki@ac.jaxa.jp
ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.
INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
No SPIE Account? Create one
PURCHASE THIS CONTENT
SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY
50 downloads per 1-year subscription
Members: 195ドル
Non-members: 335ドル ADD TO CART
25 downloads per 1-year subscription
Members: 145ドル
Non-members: 250ドル ADD TO CART
PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE
Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available
Members:
Non-members: ADD TO CART
This will count as one of your downloads.
You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).
This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.
Forgot your username?
Forgot your password?
Question mark icon
No SPIE account? Create an account
My Library
You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.
Abstract

The X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM) satellite was successfully launched and put into a low-Earth orbit on September 6, 2023 (UT). The Resolve instrument onboard XRISM hosts an X-ray microcalorimeter detector, which was designed to achieve a high-resolution (7eV FWHM at 6 keV), high-throughput, and non-dispersive spectroscopy over a wide energy range. It also excels in a low background with a requirement of <2×ばつ103s1keV1 (0.3 to 12.0 keV), which is equivalent to only one background event per spectral bin per 100-ks exposure. Event screening to discriminate X-ray events from background is a key to meeting the requirement. We present the result of the Resolve event screening using data sets recorded on the ground and in orbit based on the heritage of the preceding X-ray microcalorimeter missions, in particular, the Soft X-ray Spectrometer onboard ASTRO-H. We optimize and evaluate 19 screening items of three types based on (1) the event pulse shape, (2) relative arrival times among multiple events, and (3) good time intervals. We show that the initial screening, which is applied for science data products in the performance verification phase, reduces the background rate to 1.8×ばつ103s1keV1 meeting the requirement. We further evaluate the additional screening utilizing the correlation among some pulse shape properties of X-ray events and show that it further reduces the background rate, particularly in the <2keV band. Over 0.3 to 12 keV, the background rate becomes 1.0×ばつ103s1keV1.

1.

Introduction

The X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM)1 was successfully launched on September 6, 2023 (UT) into a low-Earth orbit of an inclination of 31 deg from JAXA’s Tanegashima Space Center using an H-IIA rocket. One of the scientific instruments is Resolve,2 which was designed to achieve high-resolution [7eV full width at half maximum (FWHM) at 6 keV], high-throughput, non-dispersive spectroscopy over a wide energy range (0.3 to 12 keV) based on X-ray microcalorimetry. The energy resolution of 4.5eV at 6 keV was actually achieved in orbit.3 Resolve was developed under an international collaboration between Japan Aerospace eXploration Agency (JAXA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), with participation from European Space Agency (ESA) based on the heritages of the X-ray spectrometer (XRS) onboard the ASTRO-E satellite,4 XRS2 onboard the ASTRO-E2 satellite,5 and the soft X-ray spectrometer (SXS) onboard the ASTRO-H satellite.6

The Resolve X-ray microcalorimeter spectrometer excels not only in energy resolution but also in low background. The requirement for the background rate is <2×ばつ103s1keV1, which is equivalent to only one background event per spectral bin per 100-ks exposure. A background level significantly lower than this requirement was indeed achieved in orbit with the SXS,7 which has almost the same design as Resolve.2 A combination of hardware and software was needed. For the hardware, the anti-coincidence detector8 worked efficiently to reduce the background rate to 23% by providing a signal that software screening used to remove events caused by cosmic-ray hits.7 For the SXS software, in addition to the screening based on the anti-coincidence detector signals, a set of event-screening criteria was developed to discriminate signal events by cosmic X-ray photons from other events of various origins, which we collectively call background events. In total, the combination of the two reduced the SXS background rate to 7.3% of the original rate.7 Owing to this low background, a new scientific discovery was made only with 17 events from a supernova remnant N132D with SXS.9

The purpose of this paper is to describe the event screening of Resolve and present its optimization and performance using the in-orbit and ground data sets. We follow the screening developed for the SXS,7 but some new screening items and algorithms were developed for Resolve. We made assessments of the existing and new items using the data taken with Resolve. Satellite-level screenings, such as telemetry loss, availability of star-tracking control, and angular distance from targets, are out of the scope of this paper. The methods presented in this paper are the latest at the time of the performance verification phase. Updates in the future will be shared with the community through the documents provided for guest observers.

A larger volume of data is available for event screening in Resolve than in SXS, both in orbit and on the ground. As for the in-orbit data, SXS was lost unexpectedly early only 34 days after launch10 due to the loss of the spacecraft attitude control in 2016, yielding only 366 ks integration of good background data constructed from Earth occultation times. Resolve has been operated in orbit under 50 mK since October 9, 2023, and longer integration by an order has already been accumulated.11

As for the ground data, Resolve acquired a more complete set of data at the highest level of integration1 ,12 ,13 compared with SXS,14 including data in the gate valve (GV) open configuration for low-energy calibration (below 4 keV), a more complete set of exposures in the extended high energy band (up to 25 keV), and exposures with monochromatic X-ray lines at additional line energies (six lines from 4.5 to 11.9 keV versus two lines from 5.4 to 8.0 keV). Here, the GV is an aperture door with an X-ray transmissive window15 to keep the cryostat leak-tight before the launch. A special apparatus was used to open the GV on the ground for low-energy data acquisition. Such data sets are not (yet) available in the in-orbit. Monochromatic X-ray sources and high energy lines above 12 keV are unavailable among celestial sources with sufficiently high fluxes. Data have not yet been taken with the GV open (GVO) in orbit as the initial attempts to open it were unsuccessful.1 These ground data sets are thus unique for developing algorithms for event screening.

The structure of this paper is as follows. In Sec. 2, we provide a brief description of the Resolve instrument to make the paper self-explanatory as much as possible. We focus on the signal processing both in orbit and on the ground. References for the other aspects of the instrument can be found in a review16 and other contributions in this volume. In Sec. 3, we explain the individual event screening items with a particular emphasis on new assessments made with Resolve using various ground and in-orbit data. Software implementations for these screening items are available online at a HEASARC web page. In Sec. 4, we present the performance of the initial screening, which is used for data products in the performance verification phase, to meet the requirement using the in-orbit data. In Sec. 5, we discuss further additional screening to increase the signal-to-noise ratio to further extend the Resolve use cases toward faint sources. The paper is concluded in Sec. 6.

2.

Signal Processing

2.1.

Detector and Analog Signal Processing in Orbit

The X-ray microcalorimeter detector consists of 6×ばつ6=36pixels (pixel 0 to 35) constituting an array with a side length of 5 mm. The array is situated in the center of an Si frame that fans out the electrical connections to the pixels. Portions of the front and back of the frame are coated with Au to assist in the transport of heat, including, on the back, the portions of the frame between pixels.8 One of the read-out channels is connected to a pixel (pixel 12) that is displaced from the array and outside of the aperture and is under constant illumination by a dedicated Fe55 calibration source. One corner pixel of the main array is not read out to accommodate this calibration pixel. Each pixel comprises a HgTe X-ray absorber and a suspended Si thermistor. The energy deposited by photoelectric absorption of X-rays is dissipated into heat, which is conducted in a 50-mK heat sink with a thermal time scale of a few ms.17

Underneath the substrate of the X-ray microcalorimeter, an Si detector is placed with a side length of 10 mm and a thickness of 0.5 mm that is used as an anti-coincidence detector (anti-co).8 Cosmic-ray particles (mostly minimum-ionizing protons) interact with the detectors mainly via ionization losses along their track lengths and are detected both by the anti-co (as charge) and the microcalorimeter (as heat). The anti-co spectrum peaks at 200 keV, whereas the spectrum of calorimeter events coincident with anti-co events peaks at 6 keV, with these peaks corresponding to the energy deposited by a relativistic proton at normal incidence to the anti-co (0.5-mm-thick Si)18 and a calorimeter absorber (0.0085-mm-thick HgTe), respectively. The pulse characteristics of cosmic-ray and X-ray events in the calorimeter are identical, which is why the anti-co is essential for the rejection of particle events. The anti-co detector is read out by two readout circuits for redundancy.

Each of the 36 microcalorimeter pixels and two anti-co channels is read out individually using a pair of signal and return lines without multiplexing. The output impedance of each detector circuit is reduced by a junction field-effect transistor (JFET) source-follower operated at 130 K17 before being transferred from inside to outside of the cryostat via a feed-through. The analog signal is received by the analog electronics called X-ray box (XBOX)17 placed outside of the cryostat. The XBOX provides the bias voltages to the microcalorimeter and anti-co detectors and processes their output by shaping, amplifying, filtering, and sampling at a rate of 80μs (12.5 kHz) with a bipolar 14-bit depth analog-to-digital converter (ADC). The signal-chain hardware up to this part is provided by NASA.

2.2.

Digital Signal Processing in Orbit

The rate of the entire time-series data (12.5kHz×ばつ16bit×ばつ38 channels) is too large to fit into the telemetry bandpass to ground stations. Therefore, a significant data reduction needs to be made in the orbit. Events are detected, and their time-series data (we call "pulse" hereafter) are processed. A handful of characteristic values are derived for each event, which are downlinked at five 10-min contacts per day.19 When resources are available in the data recorder and the telemetry bandpass, the pulse data of randomly selected events are downlinked for diagnostic purposes, which are called pulse records. This data reduction is performed using the onboard digital electronics called the pulse shape processor (PSP) provided by JAXA.20

The digitized time-series data are sent from the XBOX to the PSP, which consists of two identical units (PSP-A and PSP-B). Each unit hosts one field programmable gate array (FPGA) board and two central processing unit (CPU) boards. One FPGA board processes 18 microcalorimeters and 1 anti-co channel. One CPU board processes nine microcalorimeters and 1 or 0 anti-co channels by default. The two anti-co channels are readouts of the same set of events. We used data from the A side in the presented analysis. All cross-channel processing, such as vetoes, is done on the ground.

The FPGA board is responsible for calculating the time derivative of the incoming microcalorimeter data (ADC samples) from the XBOX using a box car filter. It triggers event candidates based on a threshold applied to the time derivative. The threshold was changed once in orbit (at 19:50 on October 31, 2023) from 75 to 120 as a precaution before the first attempt to open the GV and has been left at that value. The FPGA board also detects events in the anti-co detector data by applying a threshold in ADC samples and derives characteristic values of individual pulses: (1) the arrival time when the threshold is exceeded, (2) the maximum ADC sample value [pulse height amplitude (PHA)], and (3) the number of consecutive intervals between samples exceeding the threshold (DURATION). We recognize events with a minimum PHA of 71 (equivalent to an energy deposition of 30.5 keV at PSP A side) and a minimum DURATION of 2 to be cosmic-ray events.

The CPU board is responsible for detecting secondary pulses overlapping others and deriving characteristic values of each pulse in the microcalorimeter data. One of the values is the event grade, which is based on how an event is isolated in time from the others on the same channel. Events with no preceding pulse in a fixed time are called p(rimary) and the others s(econdary). Events without others within ±69.92ms are H(igh) grade, those without others within ±17.52ms are M(id) grade, and the rest are L(ow) grade. For the H and M grade events, the time series data of a pulse are correlated with templates for better characterization of the energy and arrival time. The template is made for each pixel from the average pulse shape of numerous events from 5.9 keV X-ray photons and noise spectra obtained in the absence of pulses. After the correlation at several shifted times (TICK_SHIFT), characteristic values such as the arrival time and pulse height (PHA; the amplitude of correlation) are derived by interpolation. Here, the TICK_SHIFT is a value that represents the extent to which the template pulse is shifted in time relative to an incoming pulse from the initial value. It is calculated by the PSP and takes integer values ranging from 8 to +7 in the unit of a sample (80μs).20 ,21 For L grade events, template fitting is not done, and their pulses are characterized similarly to anti-co events based on thresholding. Because of this difference, a systematic offset of arrival time arises among different grades. This is calibrated as a function of incoming X-ray energy for each channel22 and corrected on the ground to 5μs.

2.3.

Data Processing on the Ground

The ground processing takes several stages from levels 0 to 3 (L0 to L3). The L0 products are raw packet telemetry files in the flexible image transport system (FITS) format. The L1 products are generated by the pre-pipeline developed by JAXA,23 in which raw telemetry values are converted to engineering values in the First FITS Files. The relative arrival time correction is made at this stage. The L2 products are generated by the pipeline (PL) developed by NASA,24 in which the engineering values in the L1 products are converted into physical values based on the calibration database. The L3 products are for quick-look assessment for scientific purposes such as X-ray images, spectra, and light curves.

Event screening is performed in the PL using the xapipeline task for the satellite-wide processing and the rslpipeline task for the Resolve-specific processing. The following processing items are performed.

  • 1. The good time intervals (GTIs) based on the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) passages, Earth elevation angles, and others are calculated using the xafilter and ahgtigen tasks.

  • 2. The time of the recycling operation of the adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator (ADR), the 50-mK cooler, is calculated using the rslctsfluct and rsladrgti tasks.

  • 3. The time of modulated X-ray source (MXS) illumination is calculated using the rslmxsgti task.

  • 4. Gain tracking and correction are performed for each event.

  • 5. Various flags that can be used for potential later screening are assigned to each event using the rslflagpix and rslplsclip tasks.

  • 6. Cleaned event files are generated for scientific usage using the ahscreen task.

3.

Types of Event Screening

The Resolve event screening consists of 19 items in three categories as listed in Table 1. The items in the first category are based on the pulse shape (Sec. 3.1). Characteristic values and flags are derived in the onboard processing for each pulse, which are used to discriminate signals from background events. Those in the second category are based on the relative arrival times of multiple events arising from various physical processes that produce multiple events in the microcalorimeter and/or the anti-co detector (Sec. 3.2). Those in the third category are based on the GTI (Sec. 3.3). Time intervals not used for scientific purposes due to the spacecraft and instrument operations are identified and removed.

Table 1

Resolve event screening items.

ItemFileaValuebInit scrcRef
Screening based on event pulse shape
Rise time of a pulseEVTRISE_TIMENoSec. 3.1
Timeshift in the template fittingEVTTICK_SHIFTYesSec. 3.1
Maximum of the time derivative of pulseEVTDERIV_MAXNoSec. 3.1
Possible overlapping of pulsesEVTQUICK_DOUBLEYesSec. 3.1
Too slow rise or decay timesEVTSLOW_PULSEd YesSec. 3.1
Different slopes in pulse decayEVTSLOPE_DIFFERYesSec. 3.1
Possible saturation in the ADCEVTFLAG_CLIPPEDNoSec. 3.1
Screening based on relative event timing
Veto by the anti-coincidence detectorEVTSTATUS[3]YesSec. 3.2.1
"Short" electrical cross-talkEVTSTATUS[7:8]NoSec. 3.2.2
"Long" electrical cross-talkEVTSTATUS[13:14]NoSec. 3.2.3
Frame eventsEVTSTATUS[4]NoSec. 3.2.4
Electron recoil eventsEVTSTATUS[6]YesSec. 3.2.5
Screening based on time intervals
Recycling operation of the ADRHKADRC_CT_(CTL|MON)_FLUCYesSec. 3.3.1
Calibration X-ray illumination (MXS)EVTSTATUS[9:12]YesSec. 3.3.2
Calibration X-ray illumination (FW Fe55)HKFW_POSITION1/2YesSec. 3.3.2
Lost time due to the overload of the onboard CPUEVTSTATUS[2]YesSec. 3.3.3
Passage through the SAAEHKSAA_SXSYesSec. 3.3.4
Occultation by the EarthEHKELVYesSec. 3.3.5
COREHKCORTIMENoSec. 3.3.6

aFiles where the screening information is available (EVT for event files, HK for housekeeping telemetry files, and EHK for the extended HK files).

bValues used for screening.

cWhether the item is included in the initial screening.

dThe most significant bit of RISE_TIME is used for this flag.

3.1.

Screening Based on Pulse Shape

The PSP derives several values and flags to characterize individual pulses (Fig. 1). DERIV_MAX is the maximum value of the time derivative. RISE_TIME is defined as the time from the maximum time derivative to the zero-crossing time interpolated for sub-sample resolution. Along with TICK_SHIFT, PHA, and arrival times (Sec. 2.2), they are characteristic values of pulses. The maximum and minimum values of TICK_SHIFT are used to indicate that the template fitting was not successful. Events with such values are screened. Other than this, the event properties are not used for the initial screening.

Fig. 1

Conceptual example of the time derivative of an event.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f001.png

Flags are also given to indicate anomalies in the pulse shape (Fig. 2). The QUICK_DOUBLE flag indicates an increase of the time derivative during the decay phase before the trigger threshold is crossed again, which corresponds to the rising edge of the original pulse. SLOW_PULSE and SLOPE_DIFFER flags are set for abnormal rise or slow time scales of primary and secondary pulses, respectively.20 Events with any of these flags are removed, except for events flagged with SLOPE_DIFFER that have PI>22000. Many normal X-ray events at high energy (E>11keV) receive the SLOPE_DIFFER flag, and these events should not be removed. We examined pulse records of many events with QUICK_DOUBLE, SLOW_PULSE, and SLOPE_DIFFER flags and found that they indeed exhibit abnormal pulse shapes.

Fig. 2

Some examples of the pulse record of (a) normal events and events with (b) QUICK_DOUBLE, (c) SLOPE_DIFFER, (d) FLAG_CLIPPED, (e) short electrical crosstalk, and (f) frame event flags. Examples in panels (b)–(f) are not intended to be typical.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f002.png

The FLAG_CLIPPED flag is set for events with the possibility of hitting the maximum of the ADC. Such a flag could be given during the onboard processing when the entire pulse shape is available, but this function was not implemented. In Resolve, the rslplsclip task was developed to flag events of possible ADC saturation based on the pulse height.25 We examined the algorithm using the ground data set taken from February 14, 2022, at 14:05 to February 16, 2022, at 08:40 using a rotating target source, in which targets of an X-ray generator rotate to provide multiple lines over a wide range of energy in the integrated spectra in all event grades.12 Figure 3 shows the result, in which most FLAG_CLIPPED events appear at energies above 20 keV. Note that the maximum energy before clipping depends on pixel and detector heatsink temperature. Such events are found to degrade the energy resolution at 22 keV. The reason for this change (for high and mid-grade events) is that the shape of the gain scale is significantly affected by the pulse clipping and is not accounted for using the standard gain correction techniques. This is not, however, included in the initial screening. Many clipped events are background, from cosmic rays with long tracks in the absorbers, but some may be signals; hence, they should be included with appropriate screening and redistribution matrix functions in the future.

Fig. 3

(a) Spectrum after the initial screening with and without the FLAG_CLIPPED flag. (b) The energy resolution with and without events of FLAG_CLIPPED flag using the YKα1 (15.0 keV), MoKβ1 (19.6 keV), and AgKα1 (22.2 keV) lines. The results are almost identical for the first two lines.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f003.png

3.2.

Screening Based on Relative Timing of Multiple Events

3.2.1.

Anti-coincidence window

We assessed whether the anti-coincidence window used for the SXS also works for Resolve using its in-orbit data. Figure 4 shows the relative timing between the anti-co and microcalorimeter events during times of no ADR recycle (Sec. 3.3.1), no calibration X-ray illumination (Sec. 3.3.2), no SAA passages (Sec. 3.3.4), and the night Earth elevation <5 degrees (Sec. 3.3.5). For the microcalorimeter events, we applied the initial screening (Sec. 4) except for the anti-co screening, further applied the frame event screening (Sec. 3.2), and extracted Hp (high primary) grade (Sec. 2.2) events. The arrival time of anti-co events is earlier than the corresponding Hp microcalorimeter events by 1.860±0.004 and 1.859±0.004 samples respectively for the microcalorimeter event threshold of 75 and 120. The offset between Hp microcalorimeter and anti-co events is caused by their different definition of arrival times (Sec. 2.2). This is not corrected in the PL processing. Instead, the anti-co window is currently set wide enough to encompass the offset (6.25±6.25 samples). This is too wide for the distribution and a narrower window (2±3 samples) would be sufficient.

Fig. 4

Arrival time of anti-co events relative to microcalorimeter events before (a) and after (b) the change of the event threshold on October 31, 2023. One sample time corresponds to 80μs. The offsets for the different event thresholds agree with each other in the range of errors because the use of correlation with the template eliminates the dependence of the arrival time on different thresholds.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f004.png

3.2.2.

"Short" electrical cross-talk

Electrical cross-talk is an event for which a fraction of the signal power in a readout line is transferred to the neighboring lines via capacitive coupling. This is considered to happen in the high-impedance part of the readout in the cold stage between the detector and the JFET. The pixel numbering of the microcalorimeter detector is based on the line layout of this part; thus, an event in pixel i crosstalks to pixel i1 and i+1 except for boundaries. Anti-co channels also crosstalk to neighboring microcalorimeter channels and vice versa. We call the original events parents and the crosstalk events children hereafter.

Child events need to be removed as background, whereas parent events need to be left as signals. "Short" crosstalk screening refers to the screening when the child events are detected as events above the event threshold. "Long" crosstalk screening refers to screening events contaminated by crosstalk that did not trigger but is inferred. For the short cross-talk screening, we can utilize the relative timing and pulse height between parent-child pairs in neighboring pixels. To better characterize the relation, we used the data of monochromatic X-ray injection of a sufficiently high energy26 so that child events are detected. Three data sets of FeKα (6.4 keV), AuLα (9.7 keV), and AuLβ (11.4 keV) lines were used (Table 2). The FeKα data represent the lowest parent energy for which some child events can trigger for a threshold of 75. The AuLβ represents the highest end of the required energy band.

Table 2

Data set used for the assessment of "short" cross-talk screening.

LabelStart timeStop timeLineEnergy (keV)
0970916102022年02月01日 04:002022年02月01日 08:00FeKα6.4
0970916502022年02月01日 20:002022年02月02日 00:00AuLα9.7
0970917502022年02月02日 20:002022年02月03日 00:00AuLβ11.4

Hp events in the energy range of ±1keV of the injected line energy were considered parents. Child event candidates for each parent were extracted in two neighboring pixels within a time window and having an energy less than 0.15 keV. Figures 5 and 6 show the result using the AuLα line as an example. Both the relative arrival time and the pulse height ratio have characteristic distributions. For the former, child events precede their parent events by 5 samples. This is reasonable as the child events are faster than their parents due to their capacitive-coupling origin. For the latter, the ratio is typically below 0.005. We made the same assessment for the other two data sets and concluded that the relative window of 2 to 9 samples and the ratio below 0.005 encompasses the parent–child pairs. This screening is effective for removing the background below 0.3keV, which is relevant only after the GV is opened. Thus, the short crosstalk flags STATUS[7:8] are assigned but not used as a part of the initial screening.

Fig. 5

Result of short cross-talk assessment using the AuLα line data of individual pixels, arranged according to the physical layout of the pixels in the array, except for pixel 12 (calibration pixel). The distribution of arrival times of child events in pixel i relative to their parents in pixel i+1 (a) and i1 (b). The child events in pixels 9n+8(n=0,1,2,3) do not have parents in pixel i+1 and child events in pixels 9n do not have parents in pixel i1 due to the boundaries of the readout line layout, which is confirmed with the data with a few false coincidence exceptions.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f005.png

Fig. 6

Result of short cross-talk assessment using the AuLα line data of all pixels except for pixel 12 (calibration pixel); (a) arrival time of child event candidates relative to their parents and (b) ratio of the pulse height of child events against parents. We used Hp grade only both for the parent and child events.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f006.png

3.2.3.

"Long" electrical cross-talk

Long cross-talk screening is used to flag events in neighboring pixels that are likely contaminated by crosstalk from each other, resulting in an error in the absolute energy assigned to each pulse. The magnitude and polarity of the error in energy assignment depend on how the crosstalk interacts with the template used to process the event and thus on the offset of the pulses with respect to each other. It also depends on the energy of the neighbor pulse and the coupling between the channels, which is not the same for all neighboring pairs. For bright sources and hard spectra, the accumulated errors have a non-negligible effect compared with the required energy resolution. The optimal screening is currently under development. Careful trade-off studies depending on science cases are needed.

As the impact is causal, if the shapes of all the crosstalk pulses as a function of energy were known, we could calculate the interaction with the template as a function of offset and correct for it. We may not need to know these pulse shapes very well to significantly reduce the error, but more work is needed.

3.2.4.

Frame events

Frame events are caused by cosmic rays hitting the detector frame made of silicon. The dissipated energy propagates as heat to the microcalorimeter pixels, which can detect the disturbance as an event if the trigger threshold is exceeded. These events are the predominant background below 2keV and should be discarded. Frame events exhibit two distinctive characteristics because of their mechanism: (1) Multiple events are detected within a short time period, and (2) the detected events have a slow rise time. Based on the first characteristics, we set the window to be ±9 samples7 to flag the frame event candidates (STATUS[4]). This screening, however, is based only on time coincidence and hence is prone to false coincidence, particularly in observations of bright sources. Therefore, this is not currently included in the initial screening.

3.2.5.

Electron recoil

An electron recoil event occurs when one of the electrons generated by an incoming X-ray escapes from a pixel and deposits energy in a different pixel. Two events are recorded, and the original energy is reconstructed by summing the energy of the two. This screening is possible only for pixel 12, for which the energy of X-ray photons is limited mostly to 5.9 keV (MnKα) or 6.4 keV (MnKβ). Recoil events between other pixels are removed by the same screening that removes the frame events. The recoil events are distinguished by three criteria: (i) they occur in pixels other than pixel 12, (ii) the sum of the energies of the recoil event and the corresponding event in pixel 12 is less than the energy of MnKβ (6.5 keV, including margin), and (iii) the difference of arrival times between the recoil and the original events is within ±3 samples. A flag is set for recoil events (STATUS[6]), which are removed in the initial screening.

3.3.

Screening Based on Time Intervals

3.3.1.

ADR recycle

The working temperature for the heat sink of the microcalorimeter array is maintained at 50 mK using the ADR27 and its controller, the ADRC. Two ADRs are used in a series from the 1.2 K interface provided by the depressurized superliquid helium.28 The magnet current runs out in 2 days, and recycling takes 1h. Time intervals during the recycling operation need to be removed. The duration is based on the control parameters and on the temperature fluctuations measured by a thermometer placed at the 50-mK stage.29 The algorithm was developed and verified anew for Resolve and is implemented in the rsladrgti task for the initial screening. We confirmed that the new algorithm works by examining many ADR recycles both on the ground and in orbit executed in various conditions.

3.3.2.

Calibration X-ray illumination

Resolve has two types of calibration sources for tracking drifts in the energy scales of individual pixels besides the Fe55 calibration source constantly illuminating pixel 12 for tracking variations in common-mode gain.3 One is the MXS,30 32 in which the calibration X-rays can be switched on and off at 1/8 ms at the shortest by controlling the light-emitting diode for the source of photoelectrons in the X-ray generator.33 Events during the illumination intervals are distinguished by a set of flags (STATUS[9:12]). The other is the Fe55 sources placed in one of the filter wheel (FW) positions.30 ,31 The wheel is rotated during observations to provide intermittent X-ray illumination. Intervals of illumination are distinguished by the wheel position in the HK telemetry (FW_POSITION). Both the MXS and FW are provided by Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON). During the closed GV configuration, we use the FW Fe55 sources for the main calibration source as they can illuminate the entire array, unlike the MXS.

3.3.3.

Pixel lost time

Due to the limited CPU resources onboard, all events are not processed at count rates higher than 200s1. In such a case, the buffer storing events detected by the FPGA is discarded altogether, and only the intervals of lost events are downlinked. Each pixel has its own event buffer, and each CPU processes nine pixels in a round-robin manner. Therefore, the lost times occur differently among pixels. In most cases, this happens when observing bright point-like sources, and pixels at the array center suffer the largest loss due to the CPU limit. The detailed assessment is described separately.13

3.3.4.

SAA passage

XRISM passes through the SAA eight to nine times lasting for 3 to 30 min each in a day of 15 to 16 rotations around the Earth. Resolve continues to operate in observation mode during the SAA passages, and events are collected, which need to be removed based on the position of the spacecraft at the event time.

As the SAA region changes gradually and has shifted westward significantly from the ASTRO-H days, we redefined the region on the two-dimensional longitude–latitude projection based on the in-orbit data of the anti-co detector. Figure 7 shows the anti-co count rate in a 1-s bin averaged over a 2×ばつ2 degree grid. We used all the events taken from October 11, 2023, to December 6, 2023. We further removed events in the time intervals of the ADR recycles (Sec. 3.3.1), X-ray illumination (Sec. 3.3.2), and night Earth elevation larger than –5 deg. Figure 7 shows the non-X-ray background (NXB) count rate of the array pixels and the energy resolution of pixel 12 as a function of the anti-co count rate. As the count rate increases, the NXB rate increases, and the resolution degrades. We set the anti-co rate threshold to be <3s1. We defined the SAA region (red border in Fig. 7) so that all the grids exceeding the threshold are enclosed.

Fig. 7

(a) Map of anti-co count rate averaged over a 2×ばつ2 degree grid and red border defining SAA region. (b) The NXB count rate (all event grades) of all pixels except for pixels 11, 12, and 13 (calibration pixel and its cross-talk neighbors). The rates in three different energy bands are shown in different colors. (c) The energy resolution in eV FWHM of the MnKα line of pixel 12. The gray dash line in panels (b) and (c) shows the anti-co threshold used in the initial screening.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f007.png

3.3.5.

Earth occultation

The time intervals when the observed source is occulted by the Earth are removed based on the elevation angle of the source from the Earth’s limb. We inspected the background rate of the in-orbit data and set the threshold to be >5deg for science observations and <5deg for NXB data collection, which are the same as used for SXS. The threshold can be set differently for the Sun-lit Earth (day-Earth elevation) and the Sun-unlit Earth (night-Earth elevation): the former may require more stringent criteria to avoid Earth albedo in the soft X-ray band. However, because of the closed GV configuration, we see no difference between day and night Earth elevation, except when large solar flares produce significant hard X-ray flux. This will be revisited when the GV is successfully opened.

3.3.6.

Magnetic cut-off rigidity

The magnetic cut-off rigidity (COR) is a metric describing the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field at the moving position of the satellite. When the COR is larger, the cosmic-ray rate is reduced. The NXB rate and the energy resolution degradation depend on COR only weakly;7 thus, this metric is not used for event screening purposes. Instead, the history of COR during an observation is used to construct the background spectrum dedicated to the observation using the rslnxbgen task. The verification of the task is underway as of this writing.

4.

Initial Event Screening

Here, the initial screening is the screening applied for the PL products for the performance verification phase. The screening can be applied to all events independently of the observed source. The screening is expected to be more sophisticated as we gain more knowledge or conditions change in the future. A combination of several screening items (Table 1) is used for the initial screening. We now evaluate the performance of the initial screening using the NXB data. Here, the NXB data are constructed using all the data from October 11, 2023, when the 50-mK control started, to February 6, 2024, when the commissioning phase was concluded. We merged data both before and after the change of the event threshold to increase the statistics after confirming that the evaluation does not differ between the two. The initial screening for NXB is applied (Table 3). Time intervals of X-ray illumination were also removed. A total exposure time of 650 ks was obtained. The resultant NXB spectrum is shown in Fig. 8. The count rate in the 0.3- to 12-keV band is 1.8×ばつ103s1keV1. We conclude that the initial screening is sufficient to meet the requirement of <2.0×ばつ103s1keV1.

Table 3

Data sets used for the assessment of additional screening.a

LabelStart timeStop timeExposure (ks)Count rateEvent threshold
GVO2022年03月04日 01:302022年03月09日 23:004033.275
Abell 23192023年10月14日 07:252023年10月23日 20:301930.4675
LMC X-32023年11月16日 12:052023年11月17日 13:502040.49120
2023年11月30日 08:042023年12月03日 06:23
NXB2023年10月11日 23:132023年10月31日 19:506500.4375
2023年10月31日 19:502024年01月04日 15:07120

aCounts rate of Hp and Mp grade events in 0.1 to 12 keV (s−1 pixel−1).

Fig. 8

NXB spectra before any event screening (blue), initial screening (orange), and additional screening (green). Events of the Hp and Mp grades are used.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f008.png

5.

Additional Event Screening

5.1.

Screening Criteria

Although the initial screening in the current PL processing is sufficient to satisfy the requirement (Sec. 4), additional screening, such as applied to the ASTRO-H SXS data, but optimized for Resolve, is expected to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and extend the Resolve capability for specific sources. We exploit the fact that the characteristic values, not flags, of events (i.e., DERIV_MAX, RISE_TIME, and TICK_SHIFT) are tightly correlated with each other for X-ray events but not for background. For example, the higher the energy deposited, the greater the drop in the resistance of the thermistor, and the resulting change in the electrical component of the signal response time leads to a correlation between DERIV_MAX and RISE_TIME. Events deviating from this correlation should be considered as background events. Here, we used DERIV_MAX as opposed to another proxy of energy used in the previous work7 as the correlation is more linear between DERIV_MAX and RISE_TIME. Other criteria such as frame (Sec. 3.2.4) and cross-talk (Secs. 3.2.2 and 3.2.3) events are expected to improve screening further, but they are not presented in this work as they are currently under study.

Figure 9 shows the two-dimensional distribution of Hp and Mp events using the in-orbit data of LMC X-3 observed in late November and early December 2023. The gray dots indicate events after the initial screening. The correlations among the X-ray events are evident as the main single sequence. The distributions deviating from the main sequence are mostly made with background events, which is confirmed by inspecting the pulse shapes when the pulse record data are available. An exception is the distribution deviating upward from the main sequence at the largest DERIV_MAX end, which is made by X-ray events that are clipped. These events may be signals and hence should not be removed. Only for the purpose of clarifying the main sequence, we applied the frame-event screening (Sec. 3.2.4), which efficiently eliminates many background events though with false coincidence. Based on the frame-screened distribution of events (black dots), we defined the screening criteria shown in blue lines. Note that the presented screening applies to the data taken with the event threshold of 120. TICK_SHIFT depends on the trigger threshold; thus, different criteria for TICK_SHIFT were developed for the data taken with the event threshold of 75.

Fig. 9

(a) RISE_TIME versus DERIV_MAX and (b) TICK_SHIFT versus DERIV_MAX distribution of Hp and Mp events using the in-orbit data of LMC X-3. The grey dots are events after the initial screening. The black dots are those after the additional screening to remove frame events. The value of TICK_SHIFT is dithered by ±0.5 for presentation purposes. With the GV closed, events with an energy below 1.7keV cannot have originated from LMC X-3, but we expect real signal events to follow the trend shown here.

JATIS_11_4_042002_f009.png

5.2.

Evaluation

We now evaluate the performance of the additional screening. The result of screening depends on the count rate of the celestial object; the background may be reduced further but at a sacrifice of data due to false coincidence. There may be some pixel dependence. For the assessment, therefore, we used the data sets of different origins (Table 3), which include the ground data with the GVO and the in-orbit data of Abell 2319 and LMC X-3 observations and NXB data.

Abell 2319 is a galaxy cluster and is a diffuse source with a uniform distribution of events over the microcalorimeter array.34 LMC X-3 is a blackhole binary in the Large Magellanic Cloud35 and a point source making a concentrated event distribution at the array center. We conducted spectral fitting of LMC X-3, the brightest of the two, and found that the X-ray signals below 1.7 keV are negligible; thus, we use this energy as the boundary. The GVO data set was taken when the GV was open on the ground and provides data below 1.7keV, a region probed only by background events and spectral redistribution when the GV is closed.

We apply the additional screening and see how the background and signal events are affected. For signal events, we focus on the Hp and Mp grade events used for spectroscopy. Signal and background events dominate different energy bands for these data sets. Signal events dominate the whole band (0.1 to 20 keV) for the GVO data and in the science band (1.7 to 12 keV) for the two observations in the closed GV configuration. Background events dominate the whole band for the NXB data and in the soft band <1.7keV for the two observations.

Table 4 shows the ratio of the event rate after screening to that before in the energy band where signal or noise events dominate. The reduced rate in the signal-dominant band is due either to the false coincidence or contamination of background events in the band. More events are removed by screening for the lowest count rate data set of Abell 2319 than for the other two sets. This is likely because background events are non-negligible in the signal-dominant band of the lowest count rate data set. Based on these data, we conclude that the percentage of real source data removed by the additional screening is less than 6%. For Abell 2319 and the NXB, the additional screening reduced the rate by 95% below 1.7 keV. The reduction is lower for the highest count rate data set of LMC X-3. This is likely due to spectral redistribution from the signal dominant band at >1.7keV to the background dominant band at <1.7keV.29 These redistributed events, resulting from phenomena such as the removal of energy by escaping photons or electrons after absorption of an X-ray, represent signal information and hence should not be removed as background but should be modeled through the redistribution matrix.

Table 4

Ratio of the event rate after the additional screening to that before separately for the signal or noise-dominant energy bands.

LabelEnergy band (keV)Ratioa
Signal-dominant band
GVO1.7 to 120.998
Abell 23191.7 to 120.95
LMC X-31.7 to 120.98
Noise-dominant band
Abell 23190.1 to 1.70.05
LMC X-30.1 to 1.70.22
NXB0.1 to 1.70.05

aRatio of the event rates after the additional screening to that before.

The resultant NXB spectrum after the additional screening is shown in Fig. 8. The count rate is 1.0×ばつ103countss1keV1 in the 0.3 to 12 keV band, which is smaller than the requirement by a factor of 2. The additional screening is particularly useful below 2keV, which will be accessible after the GVOs are in orbit.

6.

Conclusion

We presented the result of the Resolve event screening using data acquired on the ground and in orbit. We assessed and optimized the screening criteria of individual screening items in three categories. New screening items (relative to SXS screening) for clipped events and ADR recycles were validated. More optimal screening criteria for the anti-coincidence detector, cross-talk events, and the SAA were developed. With the initial screening, we confirmed that the residual background rate is 1.8×ばつ103s1keV1 in the 0.3 to 12.0 keV range to meet the requirement. With the additional screening based on the relationship between the pulse-shape property characteristic of X-ray events, we found that the background is reduced further, in particular, in the 2keV band, and becomes 1.0×ばつ103s1keV1 in 0.3 to 12 keV. The additional screening will be particularly useful, when the GV is opened in the future, for soft diffuse extended sources such as supernova remnants. We will work to extend the bandpass beyond the requirement to allow access to the carbon features on the lower end and the Compton hump of many astrophysical objects on the high end. We expect refinements to the screening to be necessary. Currently, the multiple coincidence-based screening criteria overlap, and we are in the process of adding additional criteria to each, such as minimum and maximum ratios and size of the coincident group, such that the screening steps will be as distinct and precise as possible.

Disclosures

The authors declare there are no financial interests, commercial affiliations, or other potential conflicts of interest that have influenced the objectivity of this research or the writing of this paper.

Code and Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this article are proprietary and are not publicly available. The data displayed in the figures above, as well as a limited subset of the underlying data, are available upon request at mochizuki@ac.jaxa.jp.

Acknowledgments

The substantial contributions of every member of the XRISM Resolve team enabled this work. We appreciate careful reading and useful comments for improvements by two anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the JSPS Core-to-Core Program (Grant No. JPJSCCA20220002). This research has made use of data and software provided by the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), which is a service of the Astrophysics Science Division at NASA/GSFC. This work was supported by JST SPRING (Grant No. JPMJSP2108) and by the Iwadare Scholarship Foundation in 2023. Part of this work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. This paper is based on the SPIE proceeding.36

References

1.

M. S. Tashiro et al., "Development and operation status of X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM)," Proc. SPIE, 13093 130931G https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019325 PSISDG 0277-786X (2024). Google Scholar

2.

Y. Ishisaki et al., "Status of resolve instrument onboard X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM)," Proc. SPIE, 12181 121811S https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2630654 PSISDG 0277-786X (2022). Google Scholar

3.

F. S. Porter et al., "In-flight performance of the XRISM/Resolve detector system," Proc. SPIE, 13093 130931K https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3018882 (2025). Google Scholar

4.

F. S. Porter et al., "The Astro-E2 X-ray spectrometer/EBIT microcalorimeter x-ray spectrometer," Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (10), 3772 –3774 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1781758 RSINAK 0034-6748 (2004). Google Scholar

5.

R. L. Kelley et al., "The Suzaku high resolution X-ray spectrometer," Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 59 S77 –S112 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.S77 PASJAC 0004-6264 (2007). Google Scholar

6.

R. L. Kelley et al., "The Astro-H high resolution soft x-ray spectrometer," Proc. SPIE, 9905 99050V https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2232509 PSISDG 0277-786X (2016). Google Scholar

7.

C. A. Kilbourne et al., "In-flight calibration of Hitomi Soft X-ray Spectrometer. (1) Background," Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 70 18 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx139 PASJAC 0004-6264 (2018). Google Scholar

8.

C. A. Kilbourne et al., "Design, implementation, and performance of the Astro-H SXS calorimeter array and anticoincidence detector," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 011214 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.1.011214 (2018). Google Scholar

9.

Hitomi Collaboration et al., "Hitomi observations of the LMC SNR N132D: highly redshifted X-ray emission from iron ejecta," Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 70 (2), 1 –19 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx151 PASJAC 0004-6264 (2014). Google Scholar

10.

M. Tsujimoto et al., "In-orbit operation of the soft x-ray spectrometer onboard the Hitomi satellite," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 1 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.1.011205 (2017). Google Scholar

11.

Y. Maeda et al., "Initial in-orbit operation of the soft x-ray spectrometer Resolve onboard the XRISM satellite," Proc. SPIE, 13093 130931H https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3013008 (2024). Google Scholar

12.

M. E. Eckart et al., "Energy gain scale calibration of the XRISM Resolve microcalorimeter spectrometer: ground calibration results and on-orbit comparison," Proc. SPIE, 13093 130931P https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019276 (2024). Google Scholar

13.

M. Mizumoto et al., "High count rate effects in event processing for XRISM/Resolve x-ray microcalorimeter," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 11 (2025). Google Scholar

14.

M. E. Eckart et al., "Ground calibration of the Astro-H (Hitomi) soft x-ray spectrometer," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 021406 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.2.021406 (2018). Google Scholar

15.

T. Midooka et al., "X-ray transmission calibration of the gate valve for the x-ray astronomy satellite XRISM," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 7 028005 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.7.2.028005 (2021). Google Scholar

16.

K. Sato, Y. Uchida, K. Ishikawa, "Hitomi/XRISM micro-calorimeter," High-Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy, 93 –123 Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology, Singapore (2023). Google Scholar

17.

M. P. Chiao et al., "System design and implementation of the detector assembly of the Astro-H soft x-ray spectrometer," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 021404 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.2.021404 (2018). Google Scholar

18.

S. Eidelman et al., "Review of particle physics," Phys. Lett. B, 592 242 –253 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.200406001 PYLBAJ 0370-2693 (2004). Google Scholar

19.

K. R. Boyce et al., "Design and performance of the ASTRO-E/XRS signal processing system," Proc. SPIE, 3765 741 –750 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.366557 PSISDG 0277-786X (1999). Google Scholar

20.

Y. Ishisaki et al., "In-flight performance of pulse-processing system of the ASTRO-H/Hitomi soft x-ray spectrometer," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 011217 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.1.011217 (2018). Google Scholar

21.

M. Tsujimoto et al., "In-orbit performance of the digital electronics for the x-ray microcalorimeter onboard the hitomi satellite," J. Low Temp. Phys., 193 505 –511 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1861-z JLTPAC 0022-2291 (2018). Google Scholar

22.

T. Omama et al., "Relative timing calibration of the Resolve x-ray microcalorimeter onboard XRISM using the modulated x-ray source," Proc. SPIE, 12181 1218162 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2629753 PSISDG 0277-786X (2022). Google Scholar

23.

Y. Terada et al., "Detailed design of the science operations for the XRISM mission," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 7 037001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.7.3.037001 (2021). Google Scholar

24.

T. F. Doyle et al., "The XRISM pipeline software system: connecting continents, processes, testing, and scientists," Proc. SPIE, 12181 1218162 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2629753 PSISDG 0277-786X (2022). Google Scholar

25.

M. E. Eckart, Resolve Instrument team, "Resolve pulse clipping threshold," https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xrism/calib/xrism_caldbdocs.html (). Google Scholar

26.

M. A. Leutenegger et al., "Simple, compact, high-resolution monochromatic x-ray source for characterization of x-ray calorimeter arrays," Rev. Sci. Instrum., 91 083110 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005206 RSINAK 0034-6748 (2020). Google Scholar

27.

P. J. Shirron et al., "On-orbit performance of the adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator on XRISM," Proc. SPIE, 13093 1309360 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3018962 (2024). Google Scholar

28.

M. J. DiPirro et al., "Measuring the liquid helium volume on XRISM and predicting the liquid lifetime," Proc. SPIE, 13093 1309368 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3020229 (2024). Google Scholar

29.

M. Tsujimoto et al., "In-flight Calibration of Hitomi Soft X-ray Spectrometer (3) Effective Area," Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 70 (2), 1 –13 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psy008 PASJAC 0004-6264 (2018). Google Scholar

30.

C. P. de Vries et al., "Calibration sources and filters of the soft x-ray spectrometer instrument on the Hitomi spacecraft," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 4 011204 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.4.1.011204 (2017). Google Scholar

31.

R. F. Shipman et al., "In-orbit operation of resolve filter wheel and MXS," Proc. SPIE, 13093 130935W https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3017279 (2024). Google Scholar

32.

M. Sawada et al., "Strategies for the in-orbit gain tracking using the modulated x-ray sources for the Resolve microcalorimeter spectrometer on XRISM," Proc. SPIE, 13093 1309364 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019586 (2024). Google Scholar

33.

M. Sawada et al., "Pulse parameters optimization of the modulated x-ray sources for the resolve microcalorimeter spectrometer on XRISM," Proc. SPIE, 12181 1218164 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2630133 PSISDG 0277-786X (2022). Google Scholar

34.

L. Feretti, G. Giovannini and H. Böhringer, "The radio and X-ray properties of Abell 2319," New Astron., 2 501 –515 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1384-1076(97)00034-1 NEASFS 1384-1076 (1997). Google Scholar

35.

A. P. Cowley et al., "Discovery of a massive unseen star in LMC X-3," Astrophys. J., 272 118 –122 https://doi.org/10.1086/161267 ASJOAB 0004-637X (1983). Google Scholar

36.

Y. Mochizuki et al., "Optimization of x-ray event screening using ground and in-orbit data for the Resolve instrument onboard the XRISM satellite," Proc. SPIE, 13093 1309363 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019453 PSISDG 0277-786X (2024). Google Scholar

Biography

Yuto Mochizuki is a graduate school student at the University of Tokyo and the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. He received his BS degree in physics from the Tokyo University of Science and his MS degree in astronomy from the University of Tokyo in 2022 and 2024, respectively. He is a student member of SPIE.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the JSPS Core-to-Core Program (Grant No. JPJSCCA20220002). This research has made use of data and software provided by the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), which is a service of the Astrophysics Science Division at NASA/GSFC. This work was supported by JST SPRING (Grant No. JPMJSP2108) and by the Iwadare Scholarship Foundation in 2023. Part of this work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Yuto Mochizuki, Masahiro Tsujimoto , Caroline A. Kilbourne , Megan E. Eckart , Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Yoshiaki Kanemaru, Maurice A. Leutenegger , Misaki Mizumoto , Frederick S. Porter , Kosuke Sato, Makoto Sawada , and Shin’ya Yamada "Optimization of X-ray event screening using ground and in-orbit data for the Resolve instrument onboard the XRISM satellite," Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 11(4), 042002 (11 March 2025). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042002
Received: 10 October 2024; Accepted: 9 January 2025; Published: 11 March 2025
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 7 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
X-rays

Sensors

Calibration

Satellites

Crosstalk

Equipment

Light sources and illumination

Algorithm development

Gold

Iron

Erratum Email Alerts notify you when an article has been updated or the paper is withdrawn.
Visit My Account to manage your email alerts.
The alert successfully saved.
Visit My Account to manage your email alerts.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Yuto Mochizuki, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Caroline A. Kilbourne, Megan E. Eckart, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Yoshiaki Kanemaru, Maurice A. Leutenegger, Misaki Mizumoto, Frederick S. Porter, Kosuke Sato, Makoto Sawada, Shin’ya Yamada, "Optimization of X-ray event screening using ground and in-orbit data for the Resolve instrument onboard the XRISM satellite," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 11(4) 042002 (11 March 2025) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042002
Include:
Format:
Back to Top

Keywords/Phrases

Keywords
in
Remove
in
Remove
in
Remove
+ Add another field

Search In:























Publication Years

Range
Single Year

Clear Form

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /