Original ResearchtEditorial CommentDoes Intensive Blood Pressure Control Affect How Patients Feel?
Editorial Comment
Section snippets
What the ESPRIT Study Found
The ESPRIT trial randomized 10,804 adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk to receive either intensive BP treatment (target systolic BP to <120 mm Hg) or standard treatment (<140 mm Hg).5 Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at baseline and at the end of the study (a median follow-up of 3.4 years) using the 5-level EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. Although the authors reported both the utility index and the visual analog scale (VAS)
Implications for Clinical Care
These findings5 offer an important tool for conversations with patients who are hesitant about intensifying BP treatment. In addition to emphasizing the well-known benefits for reducing cardiovascular events, we can now reassure patients that treatment intensification is unlikely to worsen their quality of life, and may actually improve it. Notably, some of the patients we are most cautious about treating aggressively, such as older and more frail individuals, appeared to derive the greatest
Methodologic Considerations
Despite the strengths of the ESPRIT analysis, including a large sample size, diverse population, and high follow-up completeness,5 there are limitations to consider. The EQ-5D, although validated and widely used, is a relatively crude instrument and lacks sensitivity to detect subtle, disease-specific symptoms. Although no robust hypertension-specific, patient-reported outcome measures currently exist, symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, or cognitive decline that can occur with overtreatment
A Broader Message
The ESPRIT trial’s5 inclusion of patient-reported outcomes aligns with a growing recognition that treatment decisions should be guided not only by clinical event reductions but also by how patients feel and function. The modest but favorable effects of intensive BP control on HRQoL highlight the importance of systematically incorporating patient-reported outcomes into hypertension trials and guidelines. Capturing patients’ health status, alongside clinical events of stroke, heart failure, and
Funding Support and Author Disclosures
Dr Lu received support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (under awards R01HL69954 and R01HL169171), the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (under award HM-2022C2-28354), Sentara Research Foundation, and Novartis through Yale University outside of the submitted work. Dr Spertus discloses providing consultative services on patient-reported outcomes and evidence evaluation to BioHaven, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Terumo,
References (12)
- P.K. Whelton et al.
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2018) - X. Huang et al.
Modest effects of intensive versus blood pressure–lowering on quality of life in patients at high cardiovascular risk: the ESPIRIT Trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2025) - M.R. Law et al.
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies
BMJ
(2009) Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
N Engl J Med
(2010)A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control
N Engl J Med
(2015)- R. Rabin et al.
EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
Ann Med
(2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
- The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.
© 2025 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier.