Why is it necessary to do more effort and write more code in object-oriented programming to avoid having classes that are unnecessarily linked? What are the three main justifications for your position?

The Problem: Some people are fanatical about their programmingmethodology and refuse to acknowledge that any other system may be better.A lot of people think that object oriented programming is the only way togo and if everybody used object oriented design, all the world's programmingproblems would be solved. As a long time hacker, I've lived through a number offads, including expert programming, artificial intelligence, extremeprogramming, structured design, and many other. All of them promised to endthe world's programming problems. None of them ever did.One object oriented proponent once issued a challenge. "There is not oneprogram that can not be made better through the use of objects," he said. Thechallenge, find such a program.

Doing additional labor and code to prevent unnecessary links between classes in object-oriented programming makes sense? Your position is based on what three factors?

Does Object Orientation have to be defined? object-oriented software engineering

Does Object Orientation have to be defined? object-oriented software engineering

Object-oriented design approaches should be set up so that modelling takes precedence over procedure. Please give me one excellent explanation.

Are there any possible downsides to using object-oriented programming ideas such as data abstraction and control abstraction?

Does Object Orientation require a definition of its own? software engineering with an emphasis on objects

When applicable, object-oriented design should be used. When the situation calls for it, structured design is an acceptable option. Why does anything similar occur, etc.?

How does encapsulation contribute to the effectiveness of the Object-Oriented model?

The brief explanation of Nested Classes in Object-Oriented Programming is as follows: They provide an assortment of benefits and drawbacks (OOP).

Object-oriented design frames all problems as objects. How can one disassemble a large or complex thing into its constituent parts?

Why does object-oriented programming need additional labor and code in order to avoid classes that are unnecessary? Do you have any specific examples to back up your position?