This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] General info in AS listings

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: Santiago Urueña Pascual <suruena at gmail dot com>, Binutils mailing list <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: 2008年3月31日 10:01:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] General info in AS listings
References: <1df0a0c40803301443x39b18355iccacb92e743b7ea5@mail.gmail.com> <47F0C185.7030209@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:48:37AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> The next thing to consider is whether the feature is actually necessary ? 
> For example it seems to me that all of the information generated by your 
> new option could also be obtained from the command line or via a wrapper 
> script. So why add the option to the assembler ? The point here being 
> that it is a bad idea to add unnecessary options - feature bloat - because 
> it just makes room for more bugs.
I think it's useful. Identifying information is a big aid to
reproducibility, both for toolchain support and file archeology; both
of which I spend a lot of time doing :-)
-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] General info in AS listings
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [patch] General info in AS listings
  - From: Santiago Urueña Pascual
- Re: [patch] General info in AS listings
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]