Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove

From: Po Lu

Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove

Date: 2024年6月26日 22:51:09 +0800

User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> C-x 4 is not for window management commands, but for commands that
>> influence which window the results of a future command are to be
>> displayed in, and it has been so for a substantial period, so that users
>> won't bat an eyelid before creating bindings keeping to this pattern.
>> As such, it is perfectly logical to bind, say, ffap-other-window, in
>> this keymap, but not every command that marginally relates to window
>> management.
>
> Since `C-x 4` is the prefix we use for "other window" prefix, what is
> the most natural meaning we could give to `C-x 4 <left>`?
>
>
> Stefan
Whatever it is that C-x 4 4 C-x <left> does.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
Next by Date: Re: scratch/igc warning
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread