[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
From:
Po Lu
Subject:
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
Date:
2024年6月23日 22:15:59 +0800
User-agent:
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> writes:
> I don't trust that many such users exist, and even if they did,
> providing default keybindings for these keys will not somehow override
> the keybindings you install yourself.
Sure. And more users stand to benefit from Windmove commands if they
are bound to C-x 4, than if they were required to bind such commands
themselves, commands defined by a package that is already of marginal
interest? What extraordinary logic!
> This attitude is why Doom Emacs exists. A live software project is one
> that changes. A dead one prioritizes stasis over user experience.
Since Doom Emacs exists and is Free Software, why are users not at
liberty to install it and bid farewell to reaction and "stasis" in Emacs
development? And why is it a matter for our consideration whether we
fail or succeed in competing with them? Any mention of "competition"
with an Emacs package is already a contradiction in terms.
> Nothing we're talking about here will disturb your custom
> keybindings. Your experience will work just as it did before. The only
> difference is that users who don't have custom bindings for the arrow
> keys under C-x 4 will get windmove functionality if they don't
> customize the bindings.
Spoken like a true intellectual, in the face of a real-life example to
the contrary.
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Alan Mackenzie, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Stefan Kangas, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Alan Mackenzie, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Daniel Colascione, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Eli Zaretskii, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , chad, 2024年06月23日
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Drew Adams, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Daniel Colascione, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Po Lu, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Daniel Colascione, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Eli Zaretskii, 2024年06月23日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Gregor Zattler, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Daniel Colascione, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Eli Zaretskii, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Gregor Zattler, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Eli Zaretskii, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Joel Reicher, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Petteri Hintsanen, 2024年06月24日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Jeremy Bryant, 2024年06月25日
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove , Eli Zaretskii, 2024年06月26日