[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: ignore-error?
From:
Lars Ingebrigtsen
Subject:
Re: ignore-error?
Date:
2019年7月26日 10:08:18 +0200
User-agent:
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Let's see... It's this stuff?
>
> Yup.
>
>> The parameter should perhaps also be allowed to be a list of symbols:
>>
>> (ignore-error (file-error some-other-error)
>> (foo))
>
> Even better,
I have now added `ignore-error', and provided for completion... but
with some caveats, as `elisp-completion-at-point' isn't... er... quite
right? :-)
Right: If you say
(ignore-erC-M-i
then funpos will indicate that we're in a function position and complete
over functions (which is correct).
(ignore-error C-M-i
still has funpos indicating that we're in a function definition, which
doesn't seem correct? But even if we fix that, then `end' will indicate
that we can't complete anything anyway.
(ignore-error argC-M-i
will have everything correct and complete to
(ignore-error args-out-of-range
Unfortunately, so will
(ignore-error foo
argC-M-i
because we don't have a count at all where we are in the sexp we're
completing. But on the other hand, the sexps are usually not closed
when we're completing anyway, so I guess that's a hard problem.
And, by the way
(condition-case nil
(foo)
(argC-M-i
completes well, but not
(condition-case nil
(foo)
((argC-M-i
that is, where the condition is a list...
It seems like that completing function could, like, use more... stuff.
:-) But I guess it's a DWIM best effort kinda thing.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no