Re: `thunk-let'?

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: `thunk-let'?

From: Michael Heerdegen

Subject: Re: `thunk-let'?

Date: 2017年11月27日 06:21:12 +0100

User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> My opinion about this doesn't necessarily mean much, but I think such
> n alias could be a good thing.
Hmm - Would it even be acceptable to make `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' the
only names?
It would be strange if we would provide `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' as
alias names because we think they are actually the more suitable names,
and present the macros in the manual as `thunk-let' and `thunk-let*'.
OTOH, if we call them `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' in the docs and
everywhere, it would be strange to define them as `lazy-let' and
`lazy-let*' in the first place, and then nobody really uses these names.
Thanks,
Michael.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

Re: `thunk-let'?, (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: [ELPA] Update proposal: psgml: asl-like parsing in PI
Next by Date: Re: mouse-drag-and-drop-region
Previous by thread: Re: `thunk-let'?
Next by thread: Re: `thunk-let'?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread