[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.
From:
Tassilo Horn
Subject:
Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.
Date:
2014年7月25日 21:15:07 +0100
User-agent:
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
Matthew Plant <address@hidden> writes:
> I would argue that is still workable, through various hacks. In the cond
> case if you wanted to specify I raw string literal you would do
> (("default")), which I think is still illegal.
Yes, that's illegal. But why not #"foo" (like in Clojure regexps)? Or
SXEmacs version of raw strings #r"foo"? To me, that reads much better
than ("foo") and is much less ambiguous.
Bye,
Tassilo
>> > What if we assume that any string surrounded immediately by
>> > parenthesis is a raw string literal? I'm pretty sure every instance
>> > of ("...") is currently illegal,...
>>
>> Nope, inside a `cond', ("default") is a short alternative for (t
>> "default").
- Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Matthew Plant, 2014年07月25日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Tom Tromey, 2014年07月25日
- Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014年07月25日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Matthew Plant, 2014年07月26日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , chad, 2014年07月26日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Matthew Plant, 2014年07月26日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014年07月27日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , David Kastrup, 2014年07月27日
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. , David Caldwell, 2014年07月27日