emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption

From: Lennart Borgman
Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
Date: 2010年6月17日 21:35:51 +0200 
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> Date: 2010年6月17日 21:14:04 +0200
>> Cc: address@hidden
>>
>> > if (b->clip_changed
>> >      && !NILP (w->window_end_valid)
>> >      && w->current_matrix->buffer == b
>> >      && w->current_matrix->zv == BUF_ZV (b)
>> >      && w->current_matrix->begv == BUF_BEGV (b))
>> >  b->clip_changed = 0;
>> >
>> > So, if b->clip_changed is non-zero at entry to reconsider_clip_changes,
>> > and w->window_end_valid is non-nil, as you say, this code should have
>> > reset b->clip_changed to zero. And yet you say it didn't. Why not?
>> > what prevented it from doing so?
>>
>> I thought so first too, but please see the message I just sent with an
>> explanation of the patches I sent.
>
> Sorry, that doesn't explain it to me, because narrowing is not part of
> the recipe at all.
You are making a bad assumption. Narrowing is happening during scrolling.
> Again, PLEASE answer my questions, if you really want my help in
> understanding this issue. What parts of the above condition prevented
> reconsider_clip_changes from resetting b->clip_changed to zero?
Sorry, I thought I did tell that, but maybe I deleted that from some message.
It is !NILP (w->window_end_valid). There might be an error there too.
But it is not this that normally gives the "jumping scrolling". I am
not sure it is a problem at all.
> needed, please re-run under GDB (without your patches) and see what
> other factors are at work here.
Why should I do that?
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /