emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?)

From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?)
Date: 2007年9月07日 16:02:23 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) 
>>>>> On 2007年9月07日 02:30:40 -0400, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> 
>>>>> said:
> The Carbon+AppKit port is not strictly a new port, but can be seen as
> a variant of the Carbon port. That's one of the reasons I put such a
> name. The Carbon+AppKit port provides the same feature sets and
> shares most of the code with the existing Carbon port.
> If we install this, would we do so by changing the existing Carbon
> port?
The changes to the existing Carbon port is basically reorganization.
Some functions/variables are moved to a new file mactoolbox.c. Either
Carbon or Carbon+Appkit port can be built with the modified source.
>>>>> On 2007年9月07日 02:30:40 -0400, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> 
>>>>> said:
> That might be something we could put into a 22.3 or 22.4 release if
> Emacs 23 is not going to be as soon as we hope. It depends on how
> simple and safe the changes are.
>>>>> On 2007年9月07日 02:31:47 -0400, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> 
>>>>> said:
> Also, as I said, the Carbon+AppKit port is
> primarily a variant of the Carbon port, and therefore I think it can
> be included to the later versions of Emacs 22.
> I do not want to add such features to Emacs 22.
> Please aim at Emacs 23.
I'm confused by these contradicting reactions. Anyway, I'm not in a
hurry at all as I said. We can't get 64-bit UI support until the next
Mac OS X release planed in October.
 YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
 address@hidden
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /