Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-dat

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-dat

From: Per Abrahamsen

Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date)

Date: 2002年4月22日 14:33:44 +0200

User-agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> Making all code that displays or parse docstrings somehow support
> :link as well isn't the best approach.
How much code is that, apart from describe-variable and
customize-variable (which should be one)?

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), (continued)
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) , Andy Piper, 2002年04月19日
  - Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) , Per Abrahamsen, 2002年04月20日
    - Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) , Andy Piper, 2002年04月20日
    - Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) , Hrvoje Niksic, 2002年04月20日
    - Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) , Michael Toomim, 2002年04月20日

Prev by Date: Re: XEmacs package code
Next by Date: Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.
Previous by thread: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date)
Next by thread: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread