Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

update docs #5691

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Jintao-Huang wants to merge 3 commits into modelscope:main
base: main
Choose a base branch
Loading
from Jintao-Huang:update_docs_0906
Open

Conversation

@Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

@Jintao-Huang Jintao-Huang commented Sep 6, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1 ! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the user experience by refining the documentation for command-line parameters and addressing a critical issue related to case-sensitivity in how dataset and model identifiers are processed internally. These adjustments aim to provide clearer guidance and ensure the system correctly recognizes and loads resources based on their exact identifiers.

Highlights

  • Documentation Clarity: Updated and clarified descriptions for several command-line arguments in the documentation, including 'seed', 'load_data_args', and 'custom_register_path'.
  • Case-Sensitivity Correction: Removed redundant or incorrect .lower() calls in the dataset and model loading/registration logic, ensuring that dataset and model IDs/paths are now matched case-sensitively for improved accuracy and robustness.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request includes updates to the documentation and a functional change to enforce case-sensitivity for model and dataset identifiers. The documentation changes in docs/source/Instruction/命令行参数.md provide clearer explanations for several command-line arguments, which is a welcome improvement. The core functional change involves removing .lower() calls in swift/llm/dataset/loader.py and swift/llm/model/register.py, making model and dataset name matching case-sensitive. This enhances correctness by preventing ambiguity between identifiers that differ only in case. However, this is a potential breaking change for users who might have relied on the previous case-insensitive behavior. It is highly recommended to document this change in the pull request description and release notes. The code modifications are consistent and cleanly implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist[bot] gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /