If there is a more appropriate place to discuss this, please let me know and I'll move the discussion / delete this post. Thanks!

Hi,
The current implementation supports the main JWT RFC (RFC7519) - moving foward for the next version, is there any interest in adding functionality from other RFCs?

Such as;

• RFC7516 (JWE implementation)
• RFC8812 (ES256K alg)

Also, within this library there are currently some defined Claims types (MapClaims, RegisteredClaims) - would there be interest in adding more Claim types for supporting specific token types, such as OIDC tokens, Access Tokens etc? I expect that if this was agreed, it would only be the types that are backed by a corresponding accepted RFC

 {"typ":"at+JWT","alg":"RS256","kid":"RjEwOwOA"}

 {
 "iss": "https://authorization-server.example.com/",
 "sub": "5ba552d67",
 "aud": "https://rs.example.com/",
 "exp": 1639528912,
 "iat": 1618354090,
 "jti" : "dbe39bf3a3ba4238a513f51d6e1691c4",
 "client_id": "s6BhdRkqt3",
 "scope": "openid profile reademail"
 }

Reasoning for the additional custom tokens: it may make it easier for users to access the values in those tokens, without having to create their own custom type each time and embed a Claims type, or type switch over the MapClaims result.