Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Mismatch between the sentry documentation and the code #4672

Answered by adinauer
fabian20ro asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

In the documentation it is recommended that we use the CheckIn mechanism:

https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/java/crons/#check-ins-recommended

However, in the code, there's @ApiStatus.Experimental on all the classes/methods from this page:

e.g. https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-java/blob/main/sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/CheckIn.java

Is the api not really experimental anymore (is the annotation misleading) or is the documentation wrong?

Thank you.

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for reaching out @fabian20ro. We usually add the @ApiStatus.Experimental annotation on new features to retain a bit of freedom in shaping APIs. We simply haven't removed the experimental annotation from API, feel free to use them. There's currently no plans to change the check in APIs.

I've created #4673

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

Thanks for reaching out @fabian20ro. We usually add the @ApiStatus.Experimental annotation on new features to retain a bit of freedom in shaping APIs. We simply haven't removed the experimental annotation from API, feel free to use them. There's currently no plans to change the check in APIs.

I've created #4673

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by fabian20ro
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /