RFC 792 - Internet Control Message Protocol

[フレーム]

Network Working Group J. Postel
Request for Comments: 792 ISI
 September 1981
Updates: RFCs 777, 760
Updates: IENs 109, 128
 INTERNET CONTROL MESSAGE PROTOCOL
 DARPA INTERNET PROGRAM
 PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION
Introduction
 The Internet Protocol (IP) [1] is used for host-to-host datagram
 service in a system of interconnected networks called the
 Catenet [2]. The network connecting devices are called Gateways.
 These gateways communicate between themselves for control purposes
 via a Gateway to Gateway Protocol (GGP) [3,4]. Occasionally a
 gateway or destination host will communicate with a source host, for
 example, to report an error in datagram processing. For such
 purposes this protocol, the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP),
 is used. ICMP, uses the basic support of IP as if it were a higher
 level protocol, however, ICMP is actually an integral part of IP, and
 must be implemented by every IP module.
 ICMP messages are sent in several situations: for example, when a
 datagram cannot reach its destination, when the gateway does not have
 the buffering capacity to forward a datagram, and when the gateway
 can direct the host to send traffic on a shorter route.
 The Internet Protocol is not designed to be absolutely reliable. The
 purpose of these control messages is to provide feedback about
 problems in the communication environment, not to make IP reliable.
 There are still no guarantees that a datagram will be delivered or a
 control message will be returned. Some datagrams may still be
 undelivered without any report of their loss. The higher level
 protocols that use IP must implement their own reliability procedures
 if reliable communication is required.
 The ICMP messages typically report errors in the processing of
 datagrams. To avoid the infinite regress of messages about messages
 etc., no ICMP messages are sent about ICMP messages. Also ICMP
 messages are only sent about errors in handling fragment zero of
 fragemented datagrams. (Fragment zero has the fragment offeset equal
 zero).
 [Page 1]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Message Formats
 ICMP messages are sent using the basic IP header. The first octet of
 the data portion of the datagram is a ICMP type field; the value of
 this field determines the format of the remaining data. Any field
 labeled "unused" is reserved for later extensions and must be zero
 when sent, but receivers should not use these fields (except to
 include them in the checksum). Unless otherwise noted under the
 individual format descriptions, the values of the internet header
 fields are as follows:
 Version
 4
 IHL
 Internet header length in 32-bit words.
 Type of Service
 0
 Total Length
 Length of internet header and data in octets.
 Identification, Flags, Fragment Offset
 Used in fragmentation, see [1].
 Time to Live
 Time to live in seconds; as this field is decremented at each
 machine in which the datagram is processed, the value in this
 field should be at least as great as the number of gateways which
 this datagram will traverse.
 Protocol
 ICMP = 1
 Header Checksum
 The 16 bit one's complement of the one's complement sum of all 16
 bit words in the header. For computing the checksum, the checksum
 field should be zero. This checksum may be replaced in the
 future.
[Page 2]

September 1981
RFC 792
 Source Address
 The address of the gateway or host that composes the ICMP message.
 Unless otherwise noted, this can be any of a gateway's addresses.
 Destination Address
 The address of the gateway or host to which the message should be
 sent.
 [Page 3]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Destination Unreachable Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | unused |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Destination Address
 The source network and address from the original datagram's data.
 ICMP Fields:
 Type
 3
 Code
 0 = net unreachable;
 1 = host unreachable;
 2 = protocol unreachable;
 3 = port unreachable;
 4 = fragmentation needed and DF set;
 5 = source route failed.
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram
 The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original
[Page 4]

September 1981
RFC 792
 datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the
 message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol
 uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data
 bits of the original datagram's data.
 Description
 If, according to the information in the gateway's routing tables,
 the network specified in the internet destination field of a
 datagram is unreachable, e.g., the distance to the network is
 infinity, the gateway may send a destination unreachable message
 to the internet source host of the datagram. In addition, in some
 networks, the gateway may be able to determine if the internet
 destination host is unreachable. Gateways in these networks may
 send destination unreachable messages to the source host when the
 destination host is unreachable.
 If, in the destination host, the IP module cannot deliver the
 datagram because the indicated protocol module or process port is
 not active, the destination host may send a destination
 unreachable message to the source host.
 Another case is when a datagram must be fragmented to be forwarded
 by a gateway yet the Don't Fragment flag is on. In this case the
 gateway must discard the datagram and may return a destination
 unreachable message.
 Codes 0, 1, 4, and 5 may be received from a gateway. Codes 2 and
 3 may be received from a host.
 [Page 5]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Time Exceeded Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | unused |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Destination Address
 The source network and address from the original datagram's data.
 ICMP Fields:
 Type
 11
 Code
 0 = time to live exceeded in transit;
 1 = fragment reassembly time exceeded.
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram
 The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original
 datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the
 message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol
 uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data
 bits of the original datagram's data.
 Description
 If the gateway processing a datagram finds the time to live field
[Page 6]

September 1981
RFC 792
 is zero it must discard the datagram. The gateway may also notify
 the source host via the time exceeded message.
 If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram cannot complete the
 reassembly due to missing fragments within its time limit it
 discards the datagram, and it may send a time exceeded message.
 If fragment zero is not available then no time exceeded need be
 sent at all.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway. Code 1 may be received
 from a host.
 [Page 7]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Parameter Problem Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Pointer | unused |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Destination Address
 The source network and address from the original datagram's data.
 ICMP Fields:
 Type
 12
 Code
 0 = pointer indicates the error.
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Pointer
 If code = 0, identifies the octet where an error was detected.
 Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram
 The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original
 datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the
 message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol
 uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data
 bits of the original datagram's data.
[Page 8]

September 1981
RFC 792
 Description
 If the gateway or host processing a datagram finds a problem with
 the header parameters such that it cannot complete processing the
 datagram it must discard the datagram. One potential source of
 such a problem is with incorrect arguments in an option. The
 gateway or host may also notify the source host via the parameter
 problem message. This message is only sent if the error caused
 the datagram to be discarded.
 The pointer identifies the octet of the original datagram's header
 where the error was detected (it may be in the middle of an
 option). For example, 1 indicates something is wrong with the
 Type of Service, and (if there are options present) 20 indicates
 something is wrong with the type code of the first option.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.
 [Page 9]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Source Quench Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | unused |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Destination Address
 The source network and address of the original datagram's data.
 ICMP Fields:
 Type
 4
 Code
 0
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram
 The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original
 datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the
 message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol
 uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data
 bits of the original datagram's data.
 Description
 A gateway may discard internet datagrams if it does not have the
 buffer space needed to queue the datagrams for output to the next
 network on the route to the destination network. If a gateway
[Page 10]

September 1981
RFC 792
 discards a datagram, it may send a source quench message to the
 internet source host of the datagram. A destination host may also
 send a source quench message if datagrams arrive too fast to be
 processed. The source quench message is a request to the host to
 cut back the rate at which it is sending traffic to the internet
 destination. The gateway may send a source quench message for
 every message that it discards. On receipt of a source quench
 message, the source host should cut back the rate at which it is
 sending traffic to the specified destination until it no longer
 receives source quench messages from the gateway. The source host
 can then gradually increase the rate at which it sends traffic to
 the destination until it again receives source quench messages.
 The gateway or host may send the source quench message when it
 approaches its capacity limit rather than waiting until the
 capacity is exceeded. This means that the data datagram which
 triggered the source quench message may be delivered.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.
 [Page 11]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Redirect Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Gateway Internet Address |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Destination Address
 The source network and address of the original datagram's data.
 ICMP Fields:
 Type
 5
 Code
 0 = Redirect datagrams for the Network.
 1 = Redirect datagrams for the Host.
 2 = Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and Network.
 3 = Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and Host.
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Gateway Internet Address
 Address of the gateway to which traffic for the network specified
 in the internet destination network field of the original
 datagram's data should be sent.
[Page 12]

September 1981
RFC 792
 Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram
 The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original
 datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the
 message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol
 uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data
 bits of the original datagram's data.
 Description
 The gateway sends a redirect message to a host in the following
 situation. A gateway, G1, receives an internet datagram from a
 host on a network to which the gateway is attached. The gateway,
 G1, checks its routing table and obtains the address of the next
 gateway, G2, on the route to the datagram's internet destination
 network, X. If G2 and the host identified by the internet source
 address of the datagram are on the same network, a redirect
 message is sent to the host. The redirect message advises the
 host to send its traffic for network X directly to gateway G2 as
 this is a shorter path to the destination. The gateway forwards
 the original datagram's data to its internet destination.
 For datagrams with the IP source route options and the gateway
 address in the destination address field, a redirect message is
 not sent even if there is a better route to the ultimate
 destination than the next address in the source route.
 Codes 0, 1, 2, and 3 may be received from a gateway.
 [Page 13]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Echo or Echo Reply Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Identifier | Sequence Number |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Data ...
 +-+-+-+-+-
 IP Fields:
 Addresses
 The address of the source in an echo message will be the
 destination of the echo reply message. To form an echo reply
 message, the source and destination addresses are simply reversed,
 the type code changed to 0, and the checksum recomputed.
 IP Fields:
 Type
 8 for echo message;
 0 for echo reply message.
 Code
 0
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 If the total length is odd, the received data is padded with one
 octet of zeros for computing the checksum. This checksum may be
 replaced in the future.
 Identifier
 If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching echos and replies,
 may be zero.
 Sequence Number
[Page 14]

September 1981
RFC 792
 If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching echos and
 replies, may be zero.
 Description
 The data received in the echo message must be returned in the echo
 reply message.
 The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender
 to aid in matching the replies with the echo requests. For
 example, the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to
 identify a session, and the sequence number might be incremented
 on each echo request sent. The echoer returns these same values
 in the echo reply.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.
 [Page 15]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Timestamp or Timestamp Reply Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Identifier | Sequence Number |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Originate Timestamp |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Receive Timestamp |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Transmit Timestamp |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Addresses
 The address of the source in a timestamp message will be the
 destination of the timestamp reply message. To form a timestamp
 reply message, the source and destination addresses are simply
 reversed, the type code changed to 14, and the checksum
 recomputed.
 IP Fields:
 Type
 13 for timestamp message;
 14 for timestamp reply message.
 Code
 0
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Identifier
[Page 16]

September 1981
RFC 792
 If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching timestamp and
 replies, may be zero.
 Sequence Number
 If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching timestamp and
 replies, may be zero.
 Description
 The data received (a timestamp) in the message is returned in the
 reply together with an additional timestamp. The timestamp is 32
 bits of milliseconds since midnight UT. One use of these
 timestamps is described by Mills [5].
 The Originate Timestamp is the time the sender last touched the
 message before sending it, the Receive Timestamp is the time the
 echoer first touched it on receipt, and the Transmit Timestamp is
 the time the echoer last touched the message on sending it.
 If the time is not available in miliseconds or cannot be provided
 with respect to midnight UT then any time can be inserted in a
 timestamp provided the high order bit of the timestamp is also set
 to indicate this non-standard value.
 The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender
 to aid in matching the replies with the requests. For example,
 the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to identify
 a session, and the sequence number might be incremented on each
 request sent. The destination returns these same values in the
 reply.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.
 [Page 17]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Information Request or Information Reply Message
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Type | Code | Checksum |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Identifier | Sequence Number |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 IP Fields:
 Addresses
 The address of the source in a information request message will be
 the destination of the information reply message. To form a
 information reply message, the source and destination addresses
 are simply reversed, the type code changed to 16, and the checksum
 recomputed.
 IP Fields:
 Type
 15 for information request message;
 16 for information reply message.
 Code
 0
 Checksum
 The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's
 complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.
 For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.
 This checksum may be replaced in the future.
 Identifier
 If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching request and replies,
 may be zero.
 Sequence Number
 If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching request and
 replies, may be zero.
[Page 18]

September 1981
RFC 792
 Description
 This message may be sent with the source network in the IP header
 source and destination address fields zero (which means "this"
 network). The replying IP module should send the reply with the
 addresses fully specified. This message is a way for a host to
 find out the number of the network it is on.
 The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender
 to aid in matching the replies with the requests. For example,
 the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to identify
 a session, and the sequence number might be incremented on each
 request sent. The destination returns these same values in the
 reply.
 Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.
 [Page 19]

 September 1981
RFC 792
Summary of Message Types
 0 Echo Reply
 3 Destination Unreachable
 4 Source Quench
 5 Redirect
 8 Echo
 11 Time Exceeded
 12 Parameter Problem
 13 Timestamp
 14 Timestamp Reply
 15 Information Request
 16 Information Reply
[Page 20]

September 1981
RFC 792
References
 [1] Postel, J. (ed.), "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program
 Protocol Specification," RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences
 Institute, September 1981.
 [2] Cerf, V., "The Catenet Model for Internetworking," IEN 48,
 Information Processing Techniques Office, Defense Advanced
 Research Projects Agency, July 1978.
 [3] Strazisar, V., "Gateway Routing: An Implementation
 Specification", IEN 30, Bolt Beranek and Newman, April 1979.
 [4] Strazisar, V., "How to Build a Gateway", IEN 109, Bolt Beranek
 and Newman, August 1979.
 [5] Mills, D., "DCNET Internet Clock Service," RFC 778, COMSAT
 Laboratories, April 1981.
 [Page 21]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /