Timeline for Write program in your favorite language in another language
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2014 at 8:02 | comment | added | Thomas Baruchel | @immibis. Ah OK, sorry. In this case, I agree. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 4:50 | comment | added | Stack Exchange Broke The Law | @ברוכאל you misunderstood - I was talking about brainfuck, HQ9+, golfscript, etc. - not dc. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 3:57 | comment | added | Thomas Baruchel | @immibis. This is false. dc is an old calculator and I can assure that changing one thing in my codes would raise an error. I spent much time on some parts of the code to figure out some tricky way of putting the letters in the right order. My piece of code Postscript/dc is quite extreme: no error but changing anything will make it faulty. dc has nothing to do with "those languages"; dc is about 20 or 30 years older than "those languages"; it is generally installed on any Linux distribution. Please, browse a little if you haven't heard about it. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 1:12 | comment | added | Stack Exchange Broke The Law |
@ברוכאל it runs without errors in those languages because those languages don't have errors, or don't have errors applicable to this code. Eg. Brainfuck ignores all characters that are not in .,+-<>[] so your program is equivalent to ...[.]+ in brainfuck which is a valid but pointless program. AFAIK a brainfuck program can only be invalid by having mismatched [].
|
|
| Mar 22, 2014 at 4:39 | history | edited | Thomas Baruchel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Answer
|
| Mar 22, 2014 at 4:37 | comment | added | Thomas Baruchel | OK, I wasn't aware that such many languages could do it. I edit the code in order to put the language I actually chose. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 22:38 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | It runs without errors in GolfScript, BF, HQ9+, ... | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 22:12 | history | answered | Thomas Baruchel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |