Python 2 - 286285
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;x=a^d%2
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^d%2]40^d%2]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 286
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;x=a^d%2
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^d%2]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 285
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;x=a^d%2
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/40^d%2]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 288286
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;b=d%2;x=a^b2;x=a^d%2
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^b]4%7^d%2]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 288
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;b=d%2;x=a^b
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^b]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 286
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;x=a^d%2
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^d%2]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 289288
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;b=d%2;x=a^b
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/\\'[ord'[ord(l[i][j])%8/2^b]4%7^b]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 289
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;b=d%2;x=a^b
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' /\\'[ord(l[i][j])%8/2^b]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
Python 2 - 288
import sys
l=list(sys.stdin)
L=len;R=range
r=L(l)-2
c=L(max(l,key=L))-2
k=r+c+1
d=int(l[-1])/90%4
a=d/2;b=d%2;x=a^b
z=1-x*2;t=1-a*2
m=[k*[' ']for i in R(k)]
for i in R(r+1):
for j in R(L(l[i])-1):m[a*c+x*r+z*i+t*j][r-a*r+x*c-t*i+z*j]=' \/'[ord(l[i][j])/4%7^b]
for s in m:print''.join(s)
I strongly suspect it can be golfed more, tips are welcome.
Examples:
% python r45.py <<< "||
_____
45"
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |_
|___|
-45"
/ \
/ \ /
/
\ /
\
If the 2nd one looks misaligned, that's because of some issues with the question:
First, the underscore is at the bottom of the character "cell", while the pipe, slash and backslash are all in the middle. It would be fairer to use a dash (-) instead of underscore.
Second, with the rotation of the heart in the question, you couldn't represent it in any reasonable way if the first line was ___ (3 underscores) instead of
_, as the 1st and 3rd underscore would be "capping" the pipes in the 2nd line.
Here's a better heart:
% python r45.py <<< " _
| |
| _
| |
___
-45"
/ \ / \
\ /
\ /
\ /
- 22.9k
- 4
- 60
- 103
- 22.9k
- 4
- 60
- 103
- 22.9k
- 4
- 60
- 103
- 22.9k
- 4
- 60
- 103