brainfuck, 235 x 77 = 18,095 points
Edit: -2 bytes thanks to @Dennis
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]>>]<<,<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at (削除) an equal amount of the two characters at 77 (削除ここまで) one less - than +. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 235 x 77 = 18,095 points
Edit: -2 bytes thanks to @Dennis
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at (削除) an equal amount of the two characters at 77 (削除ここまで) one less - than +. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 235 x 77 = 18,095 points
Edit: -2 bytes thanks to @Dennis
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<,<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at (削除) an equal amount of the two characters at 77 (削除ここまで) one less - than +. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 237235 x 77 = 18,249095 points
Edit: -2 bytes thanks to @Dennis
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at an equal amount of the two characters at 77(削除) an equal amount of the two characters at 77 (削除ここまで) one less - than +. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 237 x 77 = 18,249 points
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at an equal amount of the two characters at 77. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 235 x 77 = 18,095 points
Edit: -2 bytes thanks to @Dennis
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at (削除) an equal amount of the two characters at 77 (削除ここまで) one less - than +. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 237 x 77 = 18 249,249 points
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at an equal amount of the two characters at 77. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 237 x 77 = 18 249 points
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at an equal amount of the two characters at 77. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer
brainfuck, 237 x 77 = 18,249 points
-[>--<-------]>-[>+++++>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+>+++>+++++>-->+>+>+>+>+>+>+>+++++>+>+>+>+++[<]>-]>>----------->+++++>++>->+>-------->-------->+++++>>->++++++>------>+>---->+>+++++>++>>->--------->++>++>>-[>+<---]>--------<<[>>[-<+<.>>]<<[-]<]
Wait, this isn’t code bowling?? \s
With only 8 usable characters, brainfuck is one of the worst languages to do this question. I had to start with minimising which character would inevitably appear the most, typically either + or -. After writing the first iteration of the code, I found it horribly unbalanced in favour of +s. I rearranged parts of the code, such as generation of larger numbers, to use more -. Finally, I ended up at an equal amount of the two characters at 77. It’s certainly possible to reduce this further, which I’ll have a go at tomorrow.
But hey, at least I beat the Brainflak answer