Timeline for Calculate the lowest number where the sum of the sequence of numbers exceeds a given value
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
56 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 0:25 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing ♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 18, 2018 at 9:27 | vote | accept | StudleyJr | ||
| Jan 17, 2018 at 20:18 | answer | added | Sean | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 17, 2018 at 17:03 | answer | added | chocochaos | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 17, 2018 at 9:40 | answer | added | NikoNyrh | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 23:15 | answer | added | Xcali | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 13:04 | answer | added | Bernat | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 8:52 | answer | added | Chas Brown | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 3, 2017 at 21:49 | answer | added | Sam Howard | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 3, 2017 at 15:11 | answer | added | Alonoaky | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 3, 2017 at 14:31 | comment | added | Zgarb | It's good to wait at least a week before accepting an answer, otherwise you might discourage new solutions. | |
| Dec 3, 2017 at 13:15 | vote | accept | StudleyJr | ||
| Dec 4, 2017 at 10:29 | |||||
| Dec 3, 2017 at 6:20 | history | edited | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 3, 2017 at 2:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/937140695315419136 | ||
| Dec 2, 2017 at 23:30 | answer | added | fede s. | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 22:54 | answer | added | noob | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 22:47 | comment | added | fede s. | Ah it should be f(5,000,000), not f(500,000). It's missing a 0. @duckmayr | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 22:46 | comment | added | fede s. | Same as @duckmayr, I get f(500000) = 126000, 502944. | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 21:46 | answer | added | Zgarb | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 21:26 | answer | added | Cinaski | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 21:09 | answer | added | Unihedron | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 21:03 | answer | added | ბიმო | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:59 | answer | added | duckmayr | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:54 | comment | added | duckmayr |
Can you check f(500000)? I believe the 126000th number in the sequence is 502944.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:38 | comment | added | Zgarb |
Can the outputs be in reverse order, i.e. 124,48?
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:33 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:31 | answer | added | Giuseppe | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:15 | answer | added | ბიმო | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:14 | answer | added | Misha Lavrov | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 20:01 | answer | added | Mr. Xcoder | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:36 | comment | added | Shaggy |
Would it be acceptable to include the original value of x with our output?
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:32 | comment | added | Shaggy |
Could you update to mention the expected output earlier in the spec. As it's not mentioned until after the test cases, some, like me, may miss it and just output n.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:23 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:20 | answer | added | Shaggy | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:16 | answer | added | Mr. Xcoder | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:07 | answer | added | dzaima | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:05 | history | edited | Steadybox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 19:02 | history | edited | Steadybox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:59 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing ♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:56 | answer | added | Steadybox | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:52 | answer | added | Uriel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:52 | answer | added | caird coinheringaahing ♦ | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:52 | history | edited | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:51 | comment | added | StudleyJr | Oops, everything is multiplied by 10 (my bad), will edit now | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:49 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ |
Could you recheck f(1000) = 48? The divisor sum of 48 is 124
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:42 | history | edited | Steadybox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:42 | comment | added | Mr. Xcoder | Bonuses are bad, especially when they are vague. I decided to remove it, in order to protect this from being downvoted. | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:42 | history | edited | Mr. Xcoder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Bonuses are bad, especially when they are vague, I decided to remove it
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:40 | history | edited | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:39 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ |
IS f(1,000) supposed to mean f(1000)? Is so, please remove the commas as it makes it harder to understand
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:38 | comment | added | StudleyJr | @MartinEnder Thanks, hopefully its clearer now. | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:38 | history | edited | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:32 | history | edited | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:32 | comment | added | Martin Ender |
Also, judging by your "expected output" you want both n and f(n), but you don't say so anywhere in the specification.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:31 | comment | added | Martin Ender |
Is that sequence just the sum of ns divisors? You'll probably want to state that explicitly.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:29 | history | asked | StudleyJr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |