Timeline for Take a stand against long lines
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
55 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | Community Bot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 10, 2018 at 15:49 | answer | added | JosiahRyanW | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 14, 2018 at 17:49 | answer | added | Etheryte | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 12:40 | comment | added | l4m2 |
All line breaks must be meaningful. Line breaks that can be removed and adjacent lines directly concatenated without an impact on the output, must be removed. for real life line breaks are usually not meaningful, though (int fffff(|type1 value1,|type2 value2){)
|
|
| Jul 5, 2018 at 19:27 | answer | added | AlexRacer | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 30, 2018 at 19:10 | answer | added | Sundar R | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 23, 2018 at 2:05 | answer | added | Jakob | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 14, 2018 at 21:42 | answer | added | DLosc | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 14, 2018 at 21:22 | answer | added | rturnbull | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 13, 2018 at 22:05 | vote | accept | Nick T | ||
| Feb 13, 2018 at 20:21 | comment | added | Nick T | @12Me21 updated: "1 to n, (n β₯ 1, n β Z)" | |
| Feb 13, 2018 at 20:21 | history | edited | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
constrain n
|
| Feb 13, 2018 at 19:19 | comment | added | 12Me21 |
Is n guaranteed to be positive or do we need to handle 0 as well?
|
|
| Feb 13, 2018 at 18:55 | answer | added | 12Me21 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 13, 2018 at 16:46 | answer | added | Dom Hastings | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 10:49 | answer | added | gastropner | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 23:18 | comment | added | Nick T | @ais523 the rule is meant to prevent inserting linebreaks everywhere possible vs everywhere necessary, where that then prompts abuse of the grammar to make them necessary. Rules-wise, remove the first line break, concatenating the adjacent lines. If it produces the same output, it is deemed removable, if not, it isn't. Repeat down the length of the program. | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 22:06 | history | edited | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 43 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2017 at 20:56 | answer | added | Victor | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 10:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/871306824443727873 | ||
| Jun 4, 2017 at 1:19 | comment | added | Ørjan Johansen | @Hosch250 I have interpreted the concatenation as being "with no space between", so you can still have newlines between tokens that would fuse together into one, and even without that interpretation e.g. after to-end-of-line comment markers. | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 21:21 | answer | added | Arthur Rump | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 18:54 | answer | added | darrylyeo | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 18:07 | comment | added | George Willcox | +1 This is actually a really good idea for a code golf challenge! The small number of characters per line does seem impractical though π I still love it though | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 17:02 | comment | added | user10766 | I take it that these rules require C-based programs to be written on one line since whitespace is not significant? | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 12:32 | answer | added | user41805 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 10:48 | answer | added | L3viathan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 10:30 | answer | added | kamoroso94 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 9:11 | answer | added | user63956 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 2:43 | comment | added | Ørjan Johansen | @RohanJhunjhunwala To prevent using builtin FizzBuzz commands. | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 2:40 | answer | added | Ørjan Johansen | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 2:21 | comment | added | Rohan Jhunjhunwala | Why change it to Apple Pie instead of the standard | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 1:43 | history | edited | Dennis |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 3, 2017 at 1:28 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 1:27 | answer | added | Anders Kaseorg | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 3, 2017 at 1:17 | answer | added | Not a tree | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 23:46 | comment | added | Ørjan Johansen | @CalculatorFeline That must be a mistake. | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 23:37 | comment | added | nderscore | Not sure how I feel about the "meaningful" newlines rule. When it comes to legal syntax, a wide majority of programming languages don't care about newlines and will let you write the entire program on a single line - just take a look at most of the code-golf solutions here :-P | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:56 | comment | added | Wheat Wizard♦ | On the newline restriction, if removing a specific group of newlines causes it to work but removing any single newline causes it to fail, must the newlines be removed? They are syntactically important is just that removing some of them cancels out their importance. | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:49 | comment | added | user62131 | An ambiguity we've found in the rule about linebreaks: if the program breaks upon removing one linebreak, but unbreaks upon removing additional linebreaks (i.e. removing any single linebreak breaks the program, but removing a combination of linebreaks can leave it unchanged), is that a valid answer? This came up in Lenguage, but it's probably also relevant in Retina (which cares about whether the program has an even or odd number of lines). | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:30 | answer | added | Martmists | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:15 | answer | added | Jörg Hülsermann | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:10 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:09 | answer | added | Anders Kaseorg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:03 | answer | added | Anders Kaseorg | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:59 | history | edited | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 19 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:57 | history | reopened |
anna328p totallyhuman Jörg Hülsermann mbomb007 Wheat Wizard ♦ |
||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:49 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:57 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:33 | history | edited | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:29 | history | closed | Dennis | Needs details or clarity | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:27 | answer | added | Value Ink | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:27 | answer | added | Stephen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:25 | history | edited | Martin Ender |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:23 | history | edited | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 21:17 | history | asked | Nick T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |