Timeline for Is this number triangular?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | Community Bot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| May 23, 2017 at 2:44 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Oops sorry, didn't see the OP's comment! Yes, there are some "perverse" incentives in code golfing: that 1-byte savings is more important in a code-golf question than all the efficiency in the world :) | |
| May 23, 2017 at 1:05 | history | edited | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2017 at 1:03 | comment | added | ZaMoC | OP says: "You may assume that the input is a positive integer under 10^6".But I like your idea and I will take it ,although mine gives the right result for every case using a list of 5040 elements but yours worst case needs a list of 999999 elements.Thanks for the tip! | |
| May 23, 2017 at 0:35 | comment | added | Greg Martin |
I recommend replacing 7! by #. First, it's shorter; more importantly, the current solution is not correct, as it artificially imposes a limit on the size of the input it works on.
|
|
| May 22, 2017 at 21:12 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 22, 2017 at 21:13 | |||||
| May 22, 2017 at 21:09 | history | edited | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| May 22, 2017 at 20:56 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 22, 2017 at 20:57 | |||||
| May 22, 2017 at 20:53 | history | edited | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2017 at 20:51 | history | edited | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2017 at 20:45 | history | edited | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| May 22, 2017 at 20:37 | history | answered | ZaMoC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |