Timeline for An abundance of integers!

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events

when toggle format	what	by	license	comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04	history	edited	Community Bot		Commonmark migration
Feb 22, 2017 at 13:56	comment	added	Conor O'Brien		My pleasure! If you have any more questions, ping me in the nineteenth byte with `@ConorO'Brien`
Feb 22, 2017 at 13:49	comment	added	Blocks		Thanks for so much for the explanation. It makes more sense now.
Feb 22, 2017 at 13:47	history	edited	Blocks	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 33 characters in body; deleted 1 character in body
Feb 22, 2017 at 12:28	comment	added	Conor O'Brien		In the fork chain, `#~` is evaluated after the verbs to its right are executed, so it's left argument becomes the result on the right
Feb 22, 2017 at 12:27	comment	added	Conor O'Brien		so you know about forks, right? `(f g h) y' is the same as` (f y) g (h y)`. When` f` is a cap, `([: g h) y` is roughly the same as `g h y`. As for `~`, this switches the left and right arguments. It is important to know that `~` is not a verb but is actually an adverb. It modifies a verb. For example, we could have something like `2 %~ 8`. Here, `~` modifies `%` to switch its arguments, so the expression is equivalent to `8 % 2`.
Feb 22, 2017 at 11:09	comment	added	Blocks		~ switches so it's i.e.#i. but what is the purpose of [: ?
Feb 22, 2017 at 11:06	comment	added	Blocks		Thanks for the advice! However, could you please explain the cap verb ([:) and the switch verb (~). I don't really get what they're supposed to do in this tacit verb.
Feb 22, 2017 at 1:55	comment	added	Conor O'Brien		Welcome to PPCG! We allow anonymous functions, so you can remove the leading `f=:` as part of your byte count. Also, you can get down to 19 by converting to a tacit verb: `<[:+/i.#~i.e.]%2+i.`
Feb 21, 2017 at 12:48	review	First posts
Feb 21, 2017 at 12:50
Feb 21, 2017 at 12:45	history	answered	Blocks	CC BY-SA 3.0