Timeline for Shortest code to throw SIGILL
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
43 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1 at 1:28 | answer | added | macOSisthebestOS | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 22, 2021 at 21:59 | comment | added | Criggie | @BenjaminWang there isn't one here, yet. That language really does deserve it's name. | |
| May 22, 2021 at 21:09 | comment | added | Benjamin Wang | @Criggie where is the brainfuck entry? I don’t see it. | |
| May 22, 2021 at 19:27 | answer | added | NoLongerBreathedIn | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 29, 2021 at 16:20 | answer | added | Teodor Maxim | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 31, 2018 at 4:49 | answer | added | l4m2 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 11, 2018 at 18:50 | answer | added | MD XF | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 27, 2018 at 3:10 | answer | added | MD XF | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 27, 2018 at 2:47 | answer | added | MD XF | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 1, 2017 at 9:19 | vote | accept | univalence | ||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | Community Bot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 25, 2017 at 22:22 | comment | added | Criggie | Sometimes I look for the brainfuck entry, just to marvel at how it lives up to its name. Honestly I was expecting someone would have come up with a negative-length brainfuck submission, just cos. | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 20:56 | answer | added | habs | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 0:03 | answer | added | user42682 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 16:04 | comment | added | user60199 | *people posting old programs they had that didn't work* | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 4:07 | answer | added | apricot boy | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 22, 2016 at 18:30 | comment | added | univalence | Now please explain me why I have even more votes then the SIGSEGV question? XD | |
| Nov 22, 2016 at 18:26 | history | edited | univalence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Nov 22, 2016 at 18:26 | comment | added | univalence | @CarstenS Uh. Yes, of course I mean that. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 23:01 | answer | added | user8397947 | timeline score: 13 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 22:57 | answer | added | fluffy | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 21:54 | history | edited | Oliver Ni | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:13 | answer | added | Torkel Bjørnson-Langen | timeline score: 22 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:11 | comment | added | OrangeDog | For any hardware that can raise SIGILL, the answer will be the same as the instruction length. Just put an illegal instruction somewhere and try to execute it. The only interesting thing will be the convoluted toolchain involved. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 14:44 | answer | added | Eric Towers | timeline score: 22 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 13:50 | answer | added | Florian Castellane | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 | answer | added | Torkel Bjørnson-Langen | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 22:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/800466976657260544 | ||
| Nov 20, 2016 at 18:36 | answer | added | NobodyNada | timeline score: 49 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 16:05 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 93 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 15:47 | answer | added | maservant | timeline score: 19 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 15:33 | answer | added | anatolyg | timeline score: 15 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 13:39 | answer | added | daniero | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 13:35 | answer | added | user42643 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 11:37 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 119 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 11:04 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 11:00 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 25 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 10:56 | comment | added | univalence | @ais523 Everything is allowed. | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 10:04 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer |
It really does say Illegal instruction (core dumped).
|
|
| Nov 20, 2016 at 9:59 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 9:56 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 28 | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 9:43 | comment | added | user62131 |
You might want to clarify whether the instruction has to be generated by the kernel or not. In particular, do you want to allow the program just generating it directly using the libc call raise(SIGILL)?
|
|
| Nov 20, 2016 at 9:31 | history | asked | univalence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |